2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing Evidence for Subclinical CVD in Risk Assessment

Abstract: Summary When the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) began, the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) was the preferred tool for 10-year global coronary heart disease (CHD) risk assessment. The FRS had limitations including derivation in a homogenous population lacking racial and ethnic diversity and exclusive reliance on traditional risk factors without consideration of subclinical disease measures. MESA was designed to study the prognostic value of subclinical atherosclerosis and other risk markers in a multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low CVH scores may primarily contribute to chronic subclinical damage, leading to CVDs via subclinical impairments. Previous studies have largely focused on the association of subclinical stages with each individual behaviour or health factor [ 28 ]. However, many of these factors coexist or occur in aggregation and thus may be interwoven into multiple biologically related pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low CVH scores may primarily contribute to chronic subclinical damage, leading to CVDs via subclinical impairments. Previous studies have largely focused on the association of subclinical stages with each individual behaviour or health factor [ 28 ]. However, many of these factors coexist or occur in aggregation and thus may be interwoven into multiple biologically related pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other nontraditional markers (e.g. carotid intimal thickness, ankle-brachial index, C-reactive protein), CAC is consistently the single best predictor of ASCVD risk [17][18][19].…”
Section: Coronary Artery Calcificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has renewed interest in determining the burden of subclinical disease in patients with ED [1]. In particular, there is increasing interest in the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, which has been endorsed by recent ACC/AHA guidelines for further risk stratification of the intermediate-risk patient and shown to be the single best predictor of cardiovascular risk [15, 16]. However, limited studies to date have examined CAC scores in patients with ED.…”
Section: Recent Studies On the Relationship Interaction And Temporamentioning
confidence: 99%