Proxemic as spatial strategy on social space for deaf community

Azalia, Naomira; Arvanda, Enira; Isnaeni, Hendrajaya; Kusuma, Nevine Rafa

doi:10.1063/5.0005723

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Strong colour and tonal contrasts can be used as well to help residual sight users provide missing information [8,31,45]. Alternatively, people with auditory or hearing disabilities rely on clear visual cues to help provide the missing information from the lack of sound [19,[21][22][23]47]. Therefore, due to the opposite types of sensory cues, the important distinctions between the two communities need to be properly addressed [24].…”

Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To further investigate the visual needs the d/Deaf community relies on when using sign language, Azalia et al discussed the concept of spatial proximity and what space configurations can support their communication in public places like cafés [47]. Proxemic space considers not only the amount of space needed for sign language but also the preferred distance that the conversations take place at for the comfort of the individual.…”

Section: People With Hearing Disabilities and Accessibility Of The Bu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Accessibility of the Built Environment for People with Sensory Disabilities—Review Quality and Representation of Evidence

Chidiac,

Reda,

Marjaba

2024

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People with sensory disabilities constitute a significant portion of society whose accessibility needs must be prioritized in the design of the built environment. Sensory disabilities cause a gap in the environmental information received, most commonly visual and/or auditory cues, that requires consideration to create equal opportunities and experiences for all. This paper evaluates the quality and representation of existing research on accessibility for people with sensory disabilities, aiming to identify gaps and inconsistencies in current studies. By considering variations in disability type, degree of impairment, and assistive aid usage, we seek to enhance the development of inclusive accessibility standards. Through this analysis, we aim to provide actionable insights for future research and contribute to the creation of more equitable built environments for all individuals.

show abstract