1997
DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19970406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal gastric distension modifies ingestion rate in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was established that retention results from the loss of all afferences, while the concomitant reduced volume of efferences is of little importance. During the past few years, the particular importance of the mechanisms responsible for pylorus function [122,124] and the role of gastric fundus distension in relation with the short-term control of food intake [119] further supported the prominent role of visceral sensitivity. The vagal deafferentation also induced significant changes in the pancreas which exhibited significant reductions in the pancreatic tissue mass and in the various enzyme activities, thus suggesting the importance of intestinal sensitivity for the pancreas [110].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was established that retention results from the loss of all afferences, while the concomitant reduced volume of efferences is of little importance. During the past few years, the particular importance of the mechanisms responsible for pylorus function [122,124] and the role of gastric fundus distension in relation with the short-term control of food intake [119] further supported the prominent role of visceral sensitivity. The vagal deafferentation also induced significant changes in the pancreas which exhibited significant reductions in the pancreatic tissue mass and in the various enzyme activities, thus suggesting the importance of intestinal sensitivity for the pancreas [110].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The evolution of food ingestion (g/kg body weight 0.75 ) and ingestion speed (g/min/kg body weight 0.75 ) were automatically extracted using software developed in our laboratory, according to the criteria described by Lepionka et al. (21). For the sake of reading and interpretation, results were presented as kcal/kg of live body weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of reading and interpretation, results were presented as kcal ⁄ kg of live body weight. The initial and final speed of ingestion recorded during the first and last 10 min of the meal were also computed as satiation indicators (21).…”
Section: Recording Of Eating Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slower passage rate may reduce feed intake (Boudry et al, 2004) probably due to distension of the GIT wall (Lepionka et al, 1997). Dietary fibre may also increase the contractile activity in the gut and accelerate digesta passage (Low, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%