1997
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.36.7546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity Effect Correction For Electron Beam Lithography: Highly Accurate Correction Method

Abstract: A new formula for proximity effect correction is discussed. The formula is represented by a series expansion. When infinite terms are used, the formula gives accurate optimum correction doses. The correction accuracy of the new formula is evaluated for the worst case scenario and compared with the conventional formula. It is shown that (1) the new formula suppresses correction errors to less than 0.5% for the deposited energy and (2) dimensional errors are less than 4 nm, even if only the first 3 terms are cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is of major concern since the Toshiba PEC is actually a dose modulated correction. 3 Resist parameters were defined to replicate cross-sections of contact and line/space profiles and then tested against linearity data to verify good agreement to a variety of CD data. The linearity data utilizing the resist parameters defined by cross-sectional experimental data is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Basic Process Set-up and Experimental Results For Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of major concern since the Toshiba PEC is actually a dose modulated correction. 3 Resist parameters were defined to replicate cross-sections of contact and line/space profiles and then tested against linearity data to verify good agreement to a variety of CD data. The linearity data utilizing the resist parameters defined by cross-sectional experimental data is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Basic Process Set-up and Experimental Results For Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are even no patterns at all in the case of positive resist. Of course there are several ways to improve the dose modulation method, like by increasing the number of available doses to get finer dose allocation or by increasing the number of Gaussian functions in the PSF to get a model that better matches the scattering of electrons 10 , or by using more accurate modelling and algorithms for dose allocation 11,12,13 . Another solution is to implement geometrical correction 5,14 .…”
Section: Current Correction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we define the PEC correction error as η e , the absorbed dose in resist can be described as follows [3][4] …”
Section: Pec Latitudementioning
confidence: 99%