2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1819020116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prp8 impacts cryptic but not alternative splicing frequency

Abstract: Pre-mRNA splicing must occur with extremely high fidelity. Spliceosomes assemble onto pre-mRNA guided by specific sequences (5′ splice site, 3′ splice site, and branchpoint). When splice sites are mutated, as in many hereditary diseases, the spliceosome can aberrantly select nearby pseudo- or “cryptic” splice sites, often resulting in nonfunctional protein. How the spliceosome distinguishes authentic splice sites from cryptic splice sites is poorly understood. We performed aCaenorhabditis elegansgenetic screen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutations in the core splicing machinery can also lead to derepression of cryptic splice sites and exons, as shown by analysis of cryptic 3 0 splice sites induced by cancer-associated SF3B1 mutations (Darman et al, 2015;DeBoever et al, 2015). Interestingly, a Caenorhabditis elegans genetic screen recently identified alleles of the core spliceosome component Prp8 that specifically alter cryptic splicing frequency (Mayerle et al, 2019). Notably, alterations in the accuracy of splice site recognition can lead to substantial transcriptome heterogeneity in cancer, with consequences for the generation of neoantigens of possible relevance in immunotherapy (Kahles et al, 2018; https://genome.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in the core splicing machinery can also lead to derepression of cryptic splice sites and exons, as shown by analysis of cryptic 3 0 splice sites induced by cancer-associated SF3B1 mutations (Darman et al, 2015;DeBoever et al, 2015). Interestingly, a Caenorhabditis elegans genetic screen recently identified alleles of the core spliceosome component Prp8 that specifically alter cryptic splicing frequency (Mayerle et al, 2019). Notably, alterations in the accuracy of splice site recognition can lead to substantial transcriptome heterogeneity in cancer, with consequences for the generation of neoantigens of possible relevance in immunotherapy (Kahles et al, 2018; https://genome.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Splice signal recognition is a highly efficient process and errors in splice signal recognition including splicing from unannotated splice sites (cryptic splicing) often leads to diseases (2,3). How the yeast mature spliceosome prevents incorporation of a sub-optimal/cryptic splice site is currently being investigated (4,5). However, the mechanism of efficient and faithful recognition of the enormous combinatorial library of splice signals in the mammalian transcriptome by the early spliceosomal components is still not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals bearing the unc-73(e936) allele are able to live and reproduce through self-fertilization, but are profoundly uncoordinated. Even a modest increase in splicing at the in-frame /UU splice site results in a dramatic phenotypic reversal which is visible at the plate level, making this allele a sensitive assay of perturbations to splice site choice [16,17,19] ). Because those previous screens have identified mutations on residues modelled near the active site of the spliceosome, and those mutations often change global 5' splice site choice, we concluded that a genetic screen using this allele can identify loci which are capable of affecting splice site choice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dramatic phenotype is corrected by even a small increase in in-frame splicing, making its suppression screenable. Previously identified dominant mutations that are able to suppress the unc phenotype by altering cryptic splicing in unc- 73(e936) were found in U1snRNA [20] ,] SNRP-27 [16] ; [21] and the largest and most conserved protein in the spliceosome, PRP-8 [17] . The suppressive role these mutations play in this splice site assay provided genetic evidence of a role for these protein residues in 5' splice site choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%