Key Points• The aim of this study was to compare the effects on colonic motility of prucalopride vs polyethylene glycol 3350 + electrolytes (PEG3350) in patients with chronic constipation (n = 12).• The primary endpoint was the number of high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs), which were measured using colonic manometry catheters.• In the 12-h period following treatment, a significant increase in HAPCs (p < 0.05) was observed in patients treated with prucalopride compared with those receiving PEG3350. Significant increases in co-primary and secondary endpoints were also observed in patients receiving prucalopride.• Prucalopride was found to be superior to PEG3350 in increasing colonic motility in the cleansed colon, as measured by HAPCs, in patients with chronic constipation.
AbstractBackground This study compared prucalopride, a selective, prokinetic, 5-HT 4 receptor agonist, with polyethylene glycol 3350 + electrolytes (PEG3350), an osmotic laxative, on colonic motility parameters, primarily high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs) in patients with chronic constipation. Methods This randomized, cross-over, reader-blinded study was conducted at a single site in the USA. The study was open to men and women aged 18-75 years who met study inclusion criteria. Colonic manometry catheters were inserted the day before investigation.On the investigation days, patients received oral 2 mg prucalopride or 2 9 13.8 g PEG3350 in solution. The primary endpoint was HAPC count (threshold: mean amplitude ≥100 mmHg, propagation ≥20 cm [HAPC 1 ]) in the 12 h after treatment administration. Analyses were also conducted at two co-primary thresholds: mean amplitude ≥75 mmHg, propagation ≥20 cm (HAPC 2 ); and mean amplitude ≥75 mmHg, propagation ≥10 cm (HAPC 3 ). Secondary endpoints included HAPC area under the curve (AUC), contraction force, amplitude, duration, and propagation velocity. Key Results Thirteen women were enrolled, with 12 completing the study. Significantly more HAPC 1 (8.7 AE 2.06 vs 2.9 AE 2.06; p = 0.012) and HAPC 2 (9.0 AE 2.11 vs 3.3 AE 2.11; p = 0.017) were observed in the 12-h periods with prucalopride than with PEG3350. Prucalopride significantly increased mean propagation distance and velocity (HAPC 2 ) and mean AUC, force, and amplitude (HAPC 3 ) compared with PEG3350. Adverse events were mild or moderate. Conclusions & Inferences Prucalopride was superior to PEG3350 in inducing HAPCs in patients with