In this paper we improve the recent results on the transfer of Prüfer, Gaussian and arithmetical conditions on amalgamated constructions. As an application we provide an answer to a question posed by Chhiti, Jarrar, Kabbaj and Mahdou as well as we construct various examples.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 13F05, 13A15.Proof. Assume that (r, f (r) + j) ∈ Z(R ⊲⊳ f J). Then (r, f (r) + j)(s, f (s) + j ′ ) = 0 for some non-zero element (s, f (s) + j ′ ) ∈ R ⊲⊳ f J. Hence rs = 0 and jf (s) + j ′ (f (r) + j) = 0. If s = 0, then j ′ = 0 and j ′ (f (r) + j) = 0. Otherwise, r ∈ Z(R). This proves the inclusion.We already have the inclusion {(r, f (r) + j) | j ′ (f (r) + j) = 0, for some j ′ ∈ J \ {0}} ⊆ Z(R ⊲⊳ f J). To complete the proof, it is enough for us to show that {(r, f (r) + j) | r ∈ Z(R) and j ∈ J} ⊆ Z(R ⊲⊳ f J) under the validity of any of