1991
DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70033-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pruritic papular eruption of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: A clinicopathologic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
5

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(1991) mentioned histological and clinical criteria for the diagnosis of these lesions. [15] Most of the cases of PPE in our study were seen with CD4 counts more than 350 cells/cumm. We have found only 4.54% cases, which was similar to other studies in India (Mumbai 3%) and Asia (Thailand 4.7%) indicating low incidence in Asian patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…(1991) mentioned histological and clinical criteria for the diagnosis of these lesions. [15] Most of the cases of PPE in our study were seen with CD4 counts more than 350 cells/cumm. We have found only 4.54% cases, which was similar to other studies in India (Mumbai 3%) and Asia (Thailand 4.7%) indicating low incidence in Asian patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Furthermore, the insect bite-like reaction in these patients shares features or may be even identical to the papular rash described in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. 10,11 Therefore, immunodeficiency combined with various immunologic stimuli (insect bites, drugs, or viral infections) may play a role in the pathogenesis of both eruptions. It is also likely that Wells syndrome, which has been described in patients with malignant hematologic disorders, 12 is nothing but a variant of this insect bite-like reaction.…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most detailed study of dermal hypersensitivity reaction pattern, 1 the conclusion reached was that this does not represent any particular clinical disorder but could be seen as part of urticaria, drug reaction, or eczema, and is found in a subgroup of patients with persistent excoriated papules on the trunk. The latter has been reported as a variant of papular urticaria, simply as a pruritic papular eruption, [5][6][7] subacute prurigo, [8][9][10] or itchy red bump disease, 10,11 and remains an enigmatic subgroup. 12 Our study differs in that the term urticarial dermatitis has been used to identify a subset of patients with urticarial plaques and papules, providing a link to a group of dermatological conditions with urticarial features that represent a predominantly dermal eczematous reaction.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%