2018
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.12.045002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudoinvariant feature selection for cross-sensor optical satellite images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where and are replaced by ( ) × and ( ) × with the mapping function and = ( ) ( ) and = ( ) ( ). The more detailed equation, the readers are suggested to read kernel canonical correlation analysis [1]. Therefore, according to [1], the PIFs selection is done by normalization on MAD in higher dimension denoted by,…”
Section: Pseudo-invariant Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where and are replaced by ( ) × and ( ) × with the mapping function and = ( ) ( ) and = ( ) ( ). The more detailed equation, the readers are suggested to read kernel canonical correlation analysis [1]. Therefore, according to [1], the PIFs selection is done by normalization on MAD in higher dimension denoted by,…”
Section: Pseudo-invariant Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing based on satellite images is one of the techniques to analyze the earth spatial condition. Landsat program is the one having the longest history [1]. Landsat 1 was launched in 1972, and the last generation is Landsat 8 which was launched in 2013 and is currently still operating [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute correction predicts and removes the scattering due to gases and aerosols in the atmosphere [15,16], and several models have been proposed for water bodies [17][18][19]. By contrast, the relative correction minimizes numerical differences among images using image processing techniques [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute method converts digital numbers or the top of the atmospheric reflectance of the satellite images to the surface reflectance [6]- [10]. By contrast, the relative method transforms the digital numbers or the top of the atmospheric reflectance of the images to a common level, thereby minimizing the radiometric differences among images [2], [11]- [18]. The advantage of the relative radiometric correction [or relative radiometric normalization (RRN)] over the absolute method is that such requirements as atmospheric correction model and in situ ground measurements can be avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Several studies [11], [19], [24], [25] addressed the issue of nonlinear radiometric normalization for bitemporal images with significant land-cover changes or for cross-sensor images based on the nonlinear assumption. The radiometric differences between images are considered nonlinear and kernel CCA (KCCA) is utilized to extract PIFs by projecting images into a high-dimensional feature space in which linearity exists in the projected data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%