Infection Control - Updates 2012
DOI: 10.5772/34743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Newer β-Lactamases: An Emerging Resistance Threat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
8
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest frequency of class C β-lactamases genes in P. aeruginosa were isolated from blood followed by urine, ear swab, wound swab and sputum. These results agree with the study in India reported by Basak et al (2012) 48 in that the highest percentage of class C β-lactamase genes in P. aeruginosa were found in blood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest frequency of class C β-lactamases genes in P. aeruginosa were isolated from blood followed by urine, ear swab, wound swab and sputum. These results agree with the study in India reported by Basak et al (2012) 48 in that the highest percentage of class C β-lactamase genes in P. aeruginosa were found in blood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…P. aeruginosa isolated from blood showed the highest production of bla TEM , bla SHV , bla CTXM-1 , bla VEB and bla OXA-1 genes production followed by ear swab, urine, sputum and wound swab. This result agrees with a study in India reported by Basak et al (2012) 48 where the highest β-lactamases producing P. aeruginosa isolates were from blood, but disagrees with Azizi et al (2015) 49 in Iran who found that highest production was in P. aeruginosa isolated from wound followed by urine, sputum and blood. There was insignificant association between the presence of class C β-lactamase genes and site of infection (P=0.215) found in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Aggarwal et al, (9) and Shaikh et al, (10) on similar study observed prevalence rate of 20.3% and 25.13% which is comparable to our findings. In contrast, high prevalence of ESBL producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa was also reported by Vijay Mane et al, Varun Goel et al, and Silpi Bask et al who observed 57%, 42.3% and 40% respectively (11,12,13) . This may be due to the fact that prevalence in any geographical area is influenced by the antibiotic policy of that place, the carriage rate among the hospital personnel and type of disinfectant used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…From 2008 to 2010, out of total 250 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains studied 40%, 42% and 11.2% were ESBL, AmpC β -lactamases and MBL producers respectively [40]. Amongst these ESBL and AmpC β -lactamase producers 27.2% P.aeruginosa strains produced both ESBL as well as AmpC β -lactamases.…”
Section: Scenario In Our Hospital In Last 5 Yearsmentioning
confidence: 98%