History and Interpretation in New Testament Perspective 2001
DOI: 10.1163/9789004496965_005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudonymity and Canonicity of New Testament Documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more recent years, the discussion of the suitability (or lack thereof) of pseudonymity (or allonymity) has grown immensely (see Aland 1961;Donelson 1986;Dunn 1987;Meade 1987;Bauckham 1988;Ellis 1993;Wilder 2004), and this conversation is deeply relevant to the analysis of authorship in Colossians. As some scholars have found Colossians to be pseudonymous and from a later era, this challenges details within Colossians-ones that the pseudepigrapher would have fabricated, apparently for the sake of authentication.…”
Section: Pseudonymous-authorship Currency/acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent years, the discussion of the suitability (or lack thereof) of pseudonymity (or allonymity) has grown immensely (see Aland 1961;Donelson 1986;Dunn 1987;Meade 1987;Bauckham 1988;Ellis 1993;Wilder 2004), and this conversation is deeply relevant to the analysis of authorship in Colossians. As some scholars have found Colossians to be pseudonymous and from a later era, this challenges details within Colossians-ones that the pseudepigrapher would have fabricated, apparently for the sake of authentication.…”
Section: Pseudonymous-authorship Currency/acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%