2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02341-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PseudotimeDE: inference of differential gene expression along cell pseudotime with well-calibrated p-values from single-cell RNA sequencing data

Abstract: To investigate molecular mechanisms underlying cell state changes, a crucial analysis is to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes along the pseudotime inferred from single-cell RNA-sequencing data. However, existing methods do not account for pseudotime inference uncertainty, and they have either ill-posed p-values or restrictive models. Here we propose PseudotimeDE, a DE gene identification method that adapts to various pseudotime inference methods, accounts for pseudotime inference uncertainty, and ou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a growing need to generalize our framework to identify features across more than two conditions. For example, temporal analysis of scRNA-seq data aims to identify genes whose expression levels change along cell pseudotime [ 31 ]. To tailor Clipper for such analysis, we could define a new contrast score that differentiates the genes with stationary expression (uninteresting features) from the other genes with varying expression (interesting features).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is a growing need to generalize our framework to identify features across more than two conditions. For example, temporal analysis of scRNA-seq data aims to identify genes whose expression levels change along cell pseudotime [ 31 ]. To tailor Clipper for such analysis, we could define a new contrast score that differentiates the genes with stationary expression (uninteresting features) from the other genes with varying expression (interesting features).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is evidenced by serious concerns about the widespread miscalculation and misuse of p -values in the scientific community [ 30 ]. As a result, bioinformatics tools using questionable p -values either cannot reliably control the FDR to a target level [ 23 ] or lack power to make discoveries [ 31 ]; see the “ Results ” section. Therefore, p -value-free control of FDR is desirable, as it would make data analysis more transparent and thus improve the reproducibility of scientific research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the mean expression level of a gene can be changed along pseudotime, the gene is indicated as differentially expressed which can be crucial for the underlying cellular process that generated the pseudotime. 47,48 Trajectory inference can thus illuminate the underlying biological processes by identifying key genes that play important roles in the development of particular lineages and genes differentially expressed between different lineages. Recently, Phansalkar et al applied the trajectory inference methods in developing human coronary arteries to illustrate coronary blood vessels from distinct origins can converge to equivalent states.…”
Section: Trajectory Inference Discovers Transition States In Heart Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major goal of the single-cell clustering is making a consistent group of cells because current single-cell sequencing protocols cannot provide the auxiliary information such as cell types even though it can simultaneously detect the relative gene expressions for a larger number of cells. Since a prior knowledge for the true cell type can play a pivotal role in a comprehensive analysis of the single-cell sequencing such as pseudo-temporal ordering [32][33][34] and gene regulatory networks [35][36][37], it is important to develop the accurate computational methods to predict the groups of cells with consistent labels.…”
Section: Performance Assessment Based On the True Cell-type Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%