2018
DOI: 10.1017/s2045796018000537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychiatric symptoms and risk of victimisation: a population-based study from Southeast London

Abstract: Psychiatric symptoms increase liability to victimisation compared with those without psychiatric symptoms, independently of a prior history of violence exposure and irrespective of whether they themselves are perpetrators of violence. Clinicians should be mindful of the impact of psychiatric symptoms on vulnerability to victimisation, including among those with common psychiatric symptoms and among those who are not considered at risk of perpetrating violence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
14
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The covariates and main explanatory variables remained the same. Based on our conceptual understanding, findings in previous literature, and exclusion of multicollinearity through Pearson’s correlation coefficient, we included the following as covariates in each of the models: age, gender, and living situation to reflect sociodemographic status; psychotic and substance use disorder as known risk factors for victimization compared to other diagnoses ( 2 , 22 ); victimization in childhood and youth as known risk factor for victimization across the lifespan ( 1 , 16 19 ); and finally, duration of illness and number of hospitalizations. We considered temporality between the experiences outside and those within the mental health care setting by only including observations of cases where at least one occurrence of victimization outside the mental health care system preceded the first hospitalization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The covariates and main explanatory variables remained the same. Based on our conceptual understanding, findings in previous literature, and exclusion of multicollinearity through Pearson’s correlation coefficient, we included the following as covariates in each of the models: age, gender, and living situation to reflect sociodemographic status; psychotic and substance use disorder as known risk factors for victimization compared to other diagnoses ( 2 , 22 ); victimization in childhood and youth as known risk factor for victimization across the lifespan ( 1 , 16 19 ); and finally, duration of illness and number of hospitalizations. We considered temporality between the experiences outside and those within the mental health care setting by only including observations of cases where at least one occurrence of victimization outside the mental health care system preceded the first hospitalization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with a mental health disorder have a significantly higher risk of becoming victims of violence compared to the general population (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Previous research has focused largely on violent crimes such as physical assault, aggravated acquisitive crimes, violent threats, and sexual offenses in this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associations have been found between mental health conditions (eg, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia) and the perpetration of violence toward others fueling perceptions that label these individuals as dangerous , leading to the stigmatization of this group [ 13 - 19 ]. Increasing evidence suggests that people with mental illness and psychiatric symptoms, however, are at a greater risk of victimization when compared to those without such symptoms [ 3 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 20 - 22 ]. Women with disabilities, including those with chronic mental or emotional conditions, experience higher rates of violent victimization than men with disabilities and women in the general population [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible therefore that any greater likelihood of workplace victimization experienced by people with previous depressive symptoms is less than that for IPV, because of the association of depressive symptoms with greater work absence. Epidemiological studies on victimization in mental illness have examined birth cohorts (therefore, only including individuals of a specific age) [16,17], household surveys of urban settings [18], and clinical samples [19], but have rarely evaluated nationally representative data on depressive symptoms [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%