Psycho-Emotional Violence, Its Association, Co-Occurrence, and Bidirectionality with Cyber, Physical and Sexual Violence

Paat, Yok-Fong; Markham, Christine; Peskin, Melissa F.

doi:10.1007/s40653-019-00283-z

Cited by 18 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In cyber-control victimization, verbal-emotional offline DV victimization was the main predictor variable in boys and girls. Psychological/emotional offline DV involves acts like insulting, despising, humiliating, and threatening victims [33,35,38,61], and its prevalence is high in adolescent couples [30][31][32][33][34][35]. Cyber-control victimization is also more frequent in adolescents than cyber-aggression victimization [11,22,49].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Physical victimization involves suffering the intentional use of physical force (e.g., hitting, pushing, slapping), relational victimization involves being victims of actions executed by the partner in order to gain control of their social relationships (e.g., demanding to end some friendship), and psychological-emotional victimization involves being victims of threats, insults or emotional blackmails. The prevalence of offline DV victimization in adolescents is high, especially the psychological-emotional victimization [30][31][32][33][34][35]. Offline DV victimization in a romantic relationship negatively affects adolescents' well-being and has been related to stress, anxiety, less satisfaction with life, poor academic achievement, low self-esteem, substance abuse, and eating disorders [30,31,33,36,37].…”

Section: Offline and Cyber Dating Violence Victimizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Relations among Romantic Myths, Offline Dating Violence Victimization and Cyber Dating Violence Victimization in Adolescents

Cava

Buelga

Carrascosa

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyber dating violence is an increasing problem with serious negative consequences for adolescents. Further knowledge about related variables is necessary to develop preventive strategies. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlations among cyber dating violence victimization (cyber-control and cyber-aggression), offline dating violence victimization (physical, verbal-emotional, and relational) and adolescents' beliefs in myths of romantic love; and to examine possible differences in cyber-control victimization, cyber-aggression victimization and offline dating violence victimization (relational, physical and verbal-emotional) according to adolescents' levels of belief (low vs. high) in myths of romantic love. The role of offline dating violence victimization (physical, verbal-emotional and relational) and romantic myths as predictor variables of cyber-control and cyber-aggression victimization was also explored. All these analyses were carried out separately with boys and girls. Of an initial sample of 919 adolescents, those who have had a dating relationship in the past year (492 adolescents, M = 15.10, SD = 1.59) were included. The regression analyses revealed that offline dating violence victimization and romantic myths were significant predictors of cyber-control and cyber-aggression victimization for both boys and girls, but explained variance was higher for girls. Verbal-emotional offline dating violence victimization was the main predictor of cyber-control victimization, and physical and relational offline dating violence victimizations were the main predictors of cyber-aggression victimization. These results can be useful for developing more effective offline and cyber dating violence prevention programs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Offline and Cyber Dating Violence Victimizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relations among Romantic Myths, Offline Dating Violence Victimization and Cyber Dating Violence Victimization in Adolescents

Cava

Buelga

Carrascosa

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, these groups are not mutually exclusive. For example, previous research has already pointed out the bidirectional nature of cyber aggression, i.e., cyber-victims who subsequently engage in cyber-perpetrating behaviors or cyber-aggressors who also experience cyber victimization (e.g., Paat et al, 2019 ). Thus, future studies might benefit from exploring the relationship between our primary variables of research, ITPV perpetration, and ITPV victimization by using a similar cut-off approach and adding additional insight into the data analysis, i.e., exploring these relationships the “perpetrators and victims” group, separately.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Give me your password! What are you hiding? Associated factors of intimate partner violence through technological abuse

Maftei

Dănilă

2021

Curr Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study explored the associated factors of intimate partner violence through technological abuse (ITPV) in a sample of 1113 participants aged 18 to 65 (71.3% females). Our research’s primary questions were the following: 1). Is there a significant link between relationship attachment styles and ITPV perpetration or victimization?; 2). Is there a significant link between participants’ demographic and relationship characteristics (i.e., relationship length and partners’ fidelity), online behavior (i.e., benign and toxic disinhibition), moral disengagement, psychological distress), and ITPV perpetration or victimization?; and 3). Did the COVID-19 pandemic increase ITPV perpetration or victimization?. We analyzed our data by creating three different groups, depending on participants’ answers concerning ITPV, i.e., the overall sample, abusers’ and victims’ groups. Our main results suggested significant, positive correlations between ITPV perpetration and victimization, moral disengagement, psychological distress, and online disinhibition. Age negatively correlated with IPVT victimization and perpetration. We also found significant associations between participants’ dominant relationship attachment style and their own and partners’ cheating behavior, as well as ITPV-victimization and perpetration. Finally, 13.7% to 23% of participants in all three groups considered that the Covid-19 increased the frequency of ITPV behaviors (for both abusers and victims). Results are discussed considering their theoretical and practical implications for domestic violence and the potential related prevention and intervention strategies.

show abstract

“…Different subgroups definitions were separated from these definitions, emotional/psychological dating violence definitions were obtained. In this research, emotional/psychological dating violence is defined as a subgroup of dating violence that includes emotionally hurtful behaviors such as neglect, threat, pressure, contempt, scolding, teasing and harming self-esteem (Fidan, Yeşil, 2018;Kürtül, Özdere, 2018;Larson, Piquero, Sweeten, 2016;Markham, Paat, Peskin, 2020;Set, 2020).…”

Section: 4mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between Manipulation and Dating Violence

Şenay¹,

Kayat²,

Küçüksaraç³

et al. 2021

Health Sci. Q.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Manipulation which is a type of social influence occurs when a person influences and operates another person by changing their thoughts or behaviors. Manipulation differs from its purpose. Harmful manipulation has features such as suppressing the person by manipulating the person, restricting free will and showing implicit aggression. At the same time, the manipulator’s motives are hidden and the goal is to benefit the manipulator. Dating violence is defined as being subjected to abuse by husband/ wife, date, girlfriend/boyfriend or ex-partner. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between being affected by the manipulation in students’ close relationships and exposure to dating violence in their emotional relationships. This research is descriptive. 200 students between the ages of 18-28 at Yeditepe University participated in the study. Three different questionnaire forms were used to collect data. They are respectively demographic form, being affected by the manipulation questionnaire which consists of 20 questions and the exposure to dating violence questionnaire which consists of 42 questions. The answer to each question has an equal coefficient effect. At the end of the exposure to dating violence questionnaire, there is a description of a forensic case and questions about whether the case was resolved or not. Exposure to dating violence questionnaire consists of 7 sub-categories; emotional, verbal, social, physical, economic, sexual and digital. The mean age of the participants is 22,08±2,03. Participants consist of students who 48% (N=96) are men and 52% (N=204) are women. According to Pearson Correlation analysis; there is a moderately significant positive correlation between exposure to dating violence and being affected by manipulation (r= .319, p <0.001). The findings suggest that when the rate of being affected by the manipulation in the close relationships of participants increases, dating violence increases.

show abstract

Psycho-Emotional Violence, Its Association, Co-Occurrence, and Bidirectionality with Cyber, Physical and Sexual Violence

Cited by 18 publications

References 55 publications

Relations among Romantic Myths, Offline Dating Violence Victimization and Cyber Dating Violence Victimization in Adolescents

Relations among Romantic Myths, Offline Dating Violence Victimization and Cyber Dating Violence Victimization in Adolescents

Give me your password! What are you hiding? Associated factors of intimate partner violence through technological abuse

The Relationship Between Manipulation and Dating Violence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About