Psychodata: disassembling the psychological, economic, and statistical infrastructure of ‘social-emotional learning’

Abstract

Psychology and economics are powerful sources of expert knowledge in contemporary governance. Social and emotional learning (SEL) is becoming a priority in education policy in many parts of the world. Based on the enumeration of students' 'noncognitive' skills, SEL consists of a 'psycho-economic' combination of psychometrics with economic analysis, and is producing novel forms of statistical 'psychodata' about students. Constituted by an expanding infrastructure of technologies, metrics, people, money and policies, SEL has travelled transnationally through the advocacy of psychologists, economists, and behavioural scientists, with support from think tank coalitions, philanthropies, software companies, investment schemes, and international organizations. The article examines the emerging SEL infrastructure, identifying how psychological and economics experts are producing policy-relevant scientific knowledge and statistical psychodata to influence the direction of SEL policies. It examines how the OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills, a large-scale computer-based assessment, makes 'personality' an international focus for policy intervention and 'human capital' formation, thereby translating measurable socio-emotional indicators into predicted socio-economic outcomes. The SEL measurement infrastructure instantiates psychological governance within education, one underpinned by a political rationality in which society is measured effectively through scientific fact-finding and subjects are managed affectively through psychological intervention.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Improved policy mechanisms for the promotion of future digital business economy during covid-19 pandemic

“…Williamson, B [ 31 ]. proposed Social and emotional learning (SEL) creates new statistical 'psycho-economic' types involving students and integrates psychometry with the economic analysis.…”

Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in Google Classroom

“…Instead, they evoke domain-specific 'promissory visions' (Beer, 2018). The promises of granular and socio-emotional personalisation (Williamson, 2019), and machinic neutrality and objectivity in educational assessment (Perrotta & Selwyn, 2019) are not just imported from other fields where datafication is pervasive; they have been adapted to the specificities of education. This adaptation reflects a distinctive trajectory towards a form of 'computational rationality' that frames educational problems in terms of calculability and prediction (Gulson & Webb, 2017).…”

A historical perspective on the OECD’s ‘humanitarian turn’: PISA for Development and the Learning Framework 2030

“…PISA-D has been widely critiqued for its neo-colonial rationale and frameworks (e.g. Kaess 2018), while the OECD's (mis)measure of non-cognitive domains such as well-being (Rappleye et al 2020), global competence (Auld and Morris 2019) and social and emotional learning (Williamson 2019) raise serious doubts about its capacity to assess whether systems are developing students as a 'whole person'. Although the Organisation's rebranding and expanded frameworks are positioned as necessary to assist national responses to changing global realities, we suggest that they are primarily necessary to ensure organisational survival and expansion.…”