2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2010.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychodynamic-oriented psychological assessment predicts evolution to schizophrenia at 8-year follow-up in adolescents hospitalized for a manic/mixed episode: Interest of an overall subjective rating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two scores were CGI-psychosocial risk and CGI-schizophrenia risk. This methodology has been previously described in detail, and it demonstrates a moderate to good inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.54 and 0.75, respectively) (Louet et al, 2010).…”
Section: Patient' Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two scores were CGI-psychosocial risk and CGI-schizophrenia risk. This methodology has been previously described in detail, and it demonstrates a moderate to good inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.54 and 0.75, respectively) (Louet et al, 2010).…”
Section: Patient' Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychodynamic perspective can also contribute to early detection of anxiety and, consequently, of potential vulnerability to psychosis. In this respect, we should explore the relevance of psychoanalytical methods and tools with respect to differential diagnosis and clinical prognosis (Louët et al, 2010). Projective techniques notably the Rorschach test, can enable a fine identification of different types of anxiety, and open up hypotheses on risk factors for psychosis (Wood et al, 2000;Kimhy et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of the assessments is primarily empirical: It is based on the experience of clinical psychologists specialized in projective techniques, and on the consistency of results of blind scorings of the same protocols. One of our studies was devoted to a quantitative analysis (univariate analysis) of the validity of interrater scoring and analysis (Louët, Consoli, & Cohen, 2010), based on expert guidelines: two psychodynamic-oriented psychologists scored blindly the same psychological protocols; interrater reliability was high and significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%