1994
DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1994.9954981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychogenic Origins of Multiple Chemical Sensitivities Syndrome: A Critical Review of the Research Literature

Abstract: The purpose of this review was to critically evaluate research on the psychogenic origins of multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS) syndrome. Using as keywords environmental illness, multiple chemical sensitivities, and clinical ecology, two databases--PsychLit and Medline--were searched by computer; reference lists of all articles located were also searched manually. Ten articles meeting three criteria were selected for review. Five sample selection problems, seven measurement problems, and three study design … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These psychologically based studies speculate that hypersensitivity to low levels of chemicals may be a somatization disorder (Black et al 1990) or a conditioned response (Siegel and Kreutzer 1997). Psychogenic theories, however, have been criticized for methodologic weaknesses, such as biased patient selection and the lack of presymptom data (Davidoff and Fogarty 1994). Miller and Mitzel (1995) conducted an experiment that investigated the genesis and other aspects of chemical sensitivity.…”
Section: Theories Of Etiology and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These psychologically based studies speculate that hypersensitivity to low levels of chemicals may be a somatization disorder (Black et al 1990) or a conditioned response (Siegel and Kreutzer 1997). Psychogenic theories, however, have been criticized for methodologic weaknesses, such as biased patient selection and the lack of presymptom data (Davidoff and Fogarty 1994). Miller and Mitzel (1995) conducted an experiment that investigated the genesis and other aspects of chemical sensitivity.…”
Section: Theories Of Etiology and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These (41)(42)(43). Since depression and mood swings can occur with solvent/hydrocarbon exposures and with porphyrin disturbances, these are not in themselves evidence of a psychologic etiology of MCS (40). These and other studies strongly suggest that chemical sensitivity is a physiologic not a psychologic disorder (35,36,44).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Chemical sensitivity has been reported in the literature following exposure to chlordane (14), chlorpyrifos (37), pesticides (38), formaldehyde (39), tight or sick buildings (15), and organophosphates and solvents (40). These (41)(42)(43).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of interest that the patient had a psychotic and agitated response to steroids, which is similar to the neurocognitive or emotional instability reported by MCS patients at times in response to chemical exposures. Some authors have ascribed such symptoms in chemically sensitive patients to psychiatric diagnoses (17)(18)(19), but the validity of these conclusions has been seriously questioned in a recent critical review (5). Moreover, an animal model has been recognized that can explain many of the features of such an illness on a physiological basis of time-dependent sensitization and limbic kindling or other neurological sensitization (7,(20)(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: L-boratory Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic clinical features of chemical sensitivity, which includes such factors as demographic data, frequency of symptoms, and theories of pathogenesis, have been described by several authors (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) had been an inpatient in a tertiary care hospital from May until November 1991. She had been diagnosed with intractable asthma and laryngeal stridor, and was receiving continuous intravenous infusion of epinephrine through a subclavian central venous line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%