Psychologic Impact of Chronic Orofacial Pain: A Critical Review

Karamat, Aalia; Smith, J. D.; Melek, Lydia N.; Renton, Tara

doi:10.11607/ofph.3010

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…16 Another study conducted by Jeremic-Knezevic et al on 200 women aged 18-65 years revealed that 40.4% of individuals with orofacial pain did not show signs of depression, 30.8% had mild to moderate depressive disorders, and 28.8% exhibited severe depressive disorders. 17 These research findings contradict previous studies 15,18,19 where individuals with orofacial pain were assumed to always experience depression with a high prevalence. Considering the contradictory nature of previous research findings, this systematic review aimed to provide scientific evidence from previously conducted research about the association between orofacial pain and depression.…”

Section: Introductioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

“… 11 , 37 , 39 , 40 The association between chronic orofacial pain and a psychological condition namely depression, was also investigated by Karamat et al In their study, it was revealed that orofacial might impact the severity of depression where individuals with multiple orofacial pain conditions significantly have higher levels of depression compared to those with a single condition of orofacial pain. 19 Research on neuropathic OFP revealed a similar pattern of findings. By employing the HADS to measure anxiety and depression in combination, Lopez-Jornet et al, found a positive correlation between BMS, poor sleep quality, and comorbid conditions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Association Between Orofacial Pain and Depression: A Systematic Review

Anita,

Asnely Putri,

Maulina

2024

JPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The occurrence of orofacial pain is often accompanied by comorbid conditions such as depression. Even though previous studies suggested a bidirectional correlation between orofacial pain and psychological factors, some studies still provided contradictory results. Objective This systematic review aimed at providing scientific evidence regarding the association between orofacial pain and depression in published literature. Methods The current study is a systematic literature review (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023438596) that was conducted by reviewing cross-sectional studies that investigated the association between orofacial pain and depression. Article selection was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Articles searching was performed by using three databases, namely PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus using the Boolean operator method. Article screening was carried out by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as duplication checking, suitability checking, and compatibility checking. Reviewed articles went through the risk of bias evaluation form from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Extracted data were analyzed in a qualitative method. Results Twelve studies that were conducted on 5557 participants were included in the final review. After all articles were analyzed, the correlation between orofacial pain and depression was revealed. Most articles revealed a positive correlation between orofacial pain and depression, and the rest showed how orofacial pain patients showed significantly higher depression scores compared to those individuals without orofacial pain. Conclusion The results of this systematic review suggested a correlation between orofacial pain and depression with varying degrees. Incorporating potential depressive symptoms’ treatment, when treating orofacial pain patients, should be part of the treatment plan.

show abstract

Section: Introductioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

The Association Between Orofacial Pain and Depression: A Systematic Review

Anita,

Asnely Putri,

Maulina

2024

JPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This assertion is consistent with previous research that has documented clinically noteworthy rates of depression and anxiety among individuals with chronic TMD pain. 34 On the other hand, voice function can also be recognized as a variable subject to alteration influenced by pain perception and functional challenges. This is due to the involvement of mandibular movements and structures that have a direct association with pain and functionality.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors associated with voice-related quality of life among patients with temporomandibular disorders

EMSHOFF,

ASTL,

GIOTAKIS

et al. 2024

J. Appl. Oral Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research would be important for obtaining a better understanding of voice complaints among patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Objective The identification of predictors of voice disorders associated with TMD pain was made according to Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) Axis I. Methodology Functional limitations were measured using the Jaw Functional Limitation Scales for mastication (JFLS-M), jaw mobility (JFLS-JM), and verbal and emotional expression (JFLS-VEE). Patients also completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The primary outcome was social-emotional and physical functioning as indicated by scores on the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) questionnaire. Multiple linear regression was used to model the relationship between the domains on the V-RQOL questionnaire and scores on the HADS and JFLS after adjusting for age, gender, DC/TMD diagnosis, pain intensity, and time since pain onset. Results The HADS-D (B=-1.15; 95% CI, -1.718 to -0.587; p<.001) and JFLS-VEE (B=-0.22; 95% CI, -0.40 to -0.06; p=.008) were significant predictors of scores on the V-RQOL questionnaire. Conclusion Higher scores on depression measures and limitations in verbal and emotional expression could exacerbate voice problems among TMD pain patients. Future research should promote multidisciplinary treatments for TMD pain-related voice disorders.

show abstract

“…A vast body of evidence demonstrated associations of painful TMD and migraine with psychological factors, such as depression, anxiety, stress, and somatic awareness. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] Moreover, assessment of the patient psychological status is recommended by the Axis II protocol in the DC/TMD. 5 However, not many studies compared psychological profiles of TMD and migraine patients.…”

Section: Comparison Of Psychological and Somatosensory Profiles Of Tm...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Plasma Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide as a Biomarker for Painful Temporomandibular Disorder and Migraine

Tchivileva,

Johnson,

Chai

et al. 2023

JPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To assess associations of plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) with chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD) myalgia/arthralgia or frequent/chronic migraine, alone and in combination, and to evaluate relations between the CGRP concentration and clinical, psychological, and somatosensory characteristics of participants. Methods The cross-sectional study selected four groups of adult volunteers: healthy controls (HCs), TMD without migraine, migraine without TMD, and TMD with migraine. Each group comprised 20 participants, providing 94% power to detect statistically significant associations with CGRP concentration for either TMD or migraine. TMD and headache were classified according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD and the International Classification for Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, respectively. Plasma CGRP was quantified with a validated high-sensitivity electrochemiluminescent Meso Scale Discovery assay. Questionnaires and clinical examinations were used to evaluate characteristics of TMD, headache, psychological distress, and pressure pain sensitivity. Univariate regression models quantified associations of the CGRP concentration with TMD, migraine, and their interaction. Univariate associations of the CGRP concentration with clinical, psychological, and pressure pain characteristics were also assessed. Results Among 80 participants enrolled, neither TMD nor migraine was associated with plasma CGRP concentration ( P = 0.761 and P = 0.972, respectively). The CGRP concentration (mean ± SD) was similar in all 4 groups: HCs 2.0 ± 0.7 pg/mL, TMD 2.1 ± 0.8 pg/mL, migraine 2.1 ± 0.9 pg/mL, and TMD with migraine 2.2 ± 0.7 pg/mL. CGRP concentration was positively associated with age ( P = 0.034) and marginally with body mass index ( P = 0.080) but was unrelated to other participant characteristics. Conclusion In this well-powered study, interictal plasma concentration of CGRP was a poor biomarker for TMD and migraine.

show abstract

Psychologic Impact of Chronic Orofacial Pain: A Critical Review

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

The Association Between Orofacial Pain and Depression: A Systematic Review

The Association Between Orofacial Pain and Depression: A Systematic Review

Factors associated with voice-related quality of life among patients with temporomandibular disorders

Evaluation of Plasma Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide as a Biomarker for Painful Temporomandibular Disorder and Migraine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About