2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clysa.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological characteristics of dissociation in general population

Abstract: Dissociation is defined as the separation of those processes that should be accessible, considering that both somatoform and conversion symptoms may be understood as dissociative. In recent decades, psychological variables have been related to dissociation, such as suggestibility, fantasy, alexithymia, abnormal emotional processes, and also a particular personality profile. The aim of this paper is to study the profile associated with psychoform and somatoform dissociation. The sample consisted of 355 particip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, participants with pathological dissociative experiences represent 22.6% of the entire sample, which is vital for revealing the severity of dissociative reactions in the non-clinical population. Studies conducted with non-clinical samples report that pathological dissociative experiences occur at 5.9-29.0% over a wide extension and our finding is consistent with the research in the literature (Chiu et al, 2016;Fung, Ho, & Ross, 2018;Serrano-Sevillano et al, 2017;Şar, Türk, & Öztürk, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, participants with pathological dissociative experiences represent 22.6% of the entire sample, which is vital for revealing the severity of dissociative reactions in the non-clinical population. Studies conducted with non-clinical samples report that pathological dissociative experiences occur at 5.9-29.0% over a wide extension and our finding is consistent with the research in the literature (Chiu et al, 2016;Fung, Ho, & Ross, 2018;Serrano-Sevillano et al, 2017;Şar, Türk, & Öztürk, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…De igual forma, la categorización y organización para flexibilizar su consulta a otros investigadores o personas interesadas en la temática abordada. Finalmente, se pueden realizar hipótesis o plantear preguntas de investigación encaminadas a la replicación de estudios (García, 2007;Vanegas, Barbosa & Pedraza 2017).…”
Section: éTodounclassified