2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00581.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological distress and social support are determinants of changing oral health status among an immigrant population from Ethiopia

Abstract: This study presents persuasive evidence that supports the role of psychological distress and social support as determinants of changing oral health levels, among a low socioeconomic, relatively homogenous immigrant minority population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the studies used exclusion criteria and achieved restriction. Nine studies performed stratification of the study sample as follows: Refulio et al [28] (gender and smoking habits); Bakri et al [4] and Forte et al [32](stress exposure); three studies [33,39,41] (age and race; Spalj et al [35] (age and stress exposure); Ishisaka et al [36] (smoking habits and race); and Ng et al [37] (geographic location, high and low emotional copers). Five studies performed matching between the study groups as follows: Mousavijazi et al [38] and Bakri et al [4] matched for gender and smoking habits; Lopez et al [39] matched for age, smoking habits and initial disease extent; Chiou et al [33] performed matching for marital status and smoking habits; and Ishisaka et al [36] matched for oral hygiene and preventive measures.…”
Section: Control Of Confounding Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All of the studies used exclusion criteria and achieved restriction. Nine studies performed stratification of the study sample as follows: Refulio et al [28] (gender and smoking habits); Bakri et al [4] and Forte et al [32](stress exposure); three studies [33,39,41] (age and race; Spalj et al [35] (age and stress exposure); Ishisaka et al [36] (smoking habits and race); and Ng et al [37] (geographic location, high and low emotional copers). Five studies performed matching between the study groups as follows: Mousavijazi et al [38] and Bakri et al [4] matched for gender and smoking habits; Lopez et al [39] matched for age, smoking habits and initial disease extent; Chiou et al [33] performed matching for marital status and smoking habits; and Ishisaka et al [36] matched for oral hygiene and preventive measures.…”
Section: Control Of Confounding Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the studies were conducted only with women [16,34], and two studies did not mention the gender distribution [29,31]. In most of the studies [4,17,[28][29][30]37,38,[40][41][42], the participants were patients at a university periodontal clinic or private dental practice. Five studies [31,33,35,36,41] were epidemiological surveys involving the residents in a particular area or a randomly selected general population.…”
Section: Description Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations