2001
DOI: 10.1162/003355301556347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological Expected Utility Theory and Anticipatory Feelings

Abstract: We extend expected utility theory to situations in which agents experience feelings of anticipation prior to the resolution of uncertainty. We show how these anticipatory feelings may result in time inconsistency. We provide an example from portfolio theory to illustrate the potential impact of anticipation on asset prices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
491
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 652 publications
(511 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
18
491
2
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Anxious subjects could reasonably trade off profit from waiting longer for a reduction in anxiety by selling sooner than predicted by a no-anxiety benchmark. This hypothesis is also consistent with a substantial literature on preference for resolution of uncertainty in other areas of economics [29,30,31,32,33,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…19 Anxious subjects could reasonably trade off profit from waiting longer for a reduction in anxiety by selling sooner than predicted by a no-anxiety benchmark. This hypothesis is also consistent with a substantial literature on preference for resolution of uncertainty in other areas of economics [29,30,31,32,33,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A number of theoretical contributions invoke emotions to explain behavior (Wu, 1999;Caplin and Leahy, 2001). Walther (2003Walther ( , 2007, for instance, rationalizes nonlinear probability weighting by generalizing expected utility theory: He assumes that, in addition to monetary outcomes, the decision maker cares about emotions triggered by the resolution of uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In the large literature on menu choice (Kreps [34]; Dekel, Lipman and Rustichini [14]), an agent anticipates being in one of different preference determining states. And there exist several models of the effects on choice of specific psychological states, such as 'anticipatory feelings' (Caplin and Leahy [8]). In the MMM model the cognitive process underlying choice is summarised by the order in which properties are applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%