Psychology and Poverty Reduction: A Global Special Issue

Abstract

A "global special issue" on poverty brought together 9 international psychology journals during 2010 through 2013. The purpose was to highlight psychology's contribution toward the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These goals are rooted in the "capabilities approach" and highlight the importance of fostering environments that support 3 core domains: health, basic education, and income. Here, we analyze what the global special issue contributed. As a whole the global special issue provided an account of "how" psychology engages with poverty and poverty reduction. First, the global special issue, more than other research on poverty, was focused on lower-and middle-income settings. Second, while the content of the articles could be coded into 3 specific domains (health/well-being, education/development, and society/work), the vast majority of the articles straddled more than 1 category. Third, the contents of the global special issue could be organized in terms of the type of contribution: that is, practicality, theory, description, and advocacy. We highlight the importance of addressing wider situational and sociopolitical structures that constrain capability and potential, without losing sight of the person. Psychology might (a) concentrate resources on finding out what actually works to enable poverty reduction; and (b) apply what we know to ensure that research on poverty reduction is more informative and compelling to community stakeholders, organizations, and policymakers. Such an "implementation science" could advance poverty reduction and human development.

Majority world successes and European and American failure to contain COVID‐19: Cultural collectivism and global leadership

“…The interconnectedness of humanity will be trialled by crises throughout the 21st century (the greatest among which will be environmental), and through this, a more mature form of global consciousness may emerge (Liu & Macdonald, 2016). If the parochialism of cultural vandals truly (and not just symbolically) sacks government of, by, and for the people, then it should not be able to do so without a fight: from scholars engaged with civil society (and in collaboration with one another; see Liu, in press) to produce research that makes a difference (Carr et al, 2014), whatever the political system they inhabit.…”

From Handmaidens to POSH Humanitarians: The Case for Making Human Capabilities the Business of I-O Psychology

“…Despite these concerns we believe that psychology, and in particular I-O psychology, has much to add to humanitarian efforts (e.g., see a review by Carr et al, 2014). I-O psychology as a discipline is already helping to address salient humanitarian priorities as evidenced by such prominent developments as the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP)’s establishment of consultative status with the United Nations (Scott, 2011), the adoption of the United Nations Global Compact by I-O psychology programs (Mallory et al, 2015), contributions made by I-O psychologists to a report by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, 2014) on the role of the private sector in poverty reduction, and the prominent role of an I-O psychologist in the development of an initiative to deliver evidence-based solutions to the United Nations Secretary General (United Nations, 2016).…”

Pobreza y funcionamiento psicológico. Revisión sucinta de una relación en dos vías

“…A la par de estos trabajos, y con la consolidación de la labor social del psicólogo, surgieron teorías orientadas a explicar la alta dependencia de las personas en situación de pobreza de los servicios estatales, así se posicionaron un conjunto de explicaciones de corte psicoanalítico que identificaron el desarrollo psicosexual y el ego como causas de desórdenes de carácter que podrían perpetuar la pobreza (Curran, 2002). Carr et al, (2014) señalan que las décadas de 1970 y 1980 se caracterizaron por una especie de crisis de confianza en la habilidad de la psicología para aportar a la solución de la pobreza. En ese sentido, no sorprende entonces que la verdadera revolución haya provenido del trabajo interdisciplinario entre la economía y la psicología, cuando, inicialmente por parte de un economista, Herbert Simon, y años después con el trabajo de dos psicólogos, Amos Tversky y Daniel Kahneman, surgiera un campo de estudio que transformó de forma definitiva la manera en que las ciencias sociales se aproximan a diferentes fenómenos, particularmente a aquellos relacionados con la elección de los individuos.…”