Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research

Nuruhidin, Ahmad; Putra, Firmansyah; Pamungkas, Okky Indera; Ardiyanto, Hysa; Saputro, Deny Pradana

doi:10.33292/petier.v1i1.19

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Within the evaluation research, the model that had been adopted in evaluating the coaching programs for the running athletics in the athletic clubs within the Province of Yogyakarta Special Region was the CIPP Model. CIPP stands for Context, Input, Process and Product (Astuti, Haryanto, & Prihatni, 2018;Bukit, Bastari, & Putra, 2019;Hanifah & Irambona, 2019;Mulyatiningsih, 2011, p. 124;Nuruhidin, Putra, Pamungkas, Ardiyanto, & Saputro, 2018;Stufflebeam, 2003;Tseng, Diez, Lou, Tsai, & Tsai, 2010). Within the conduct of the study, the CIPP Evaluation Model was performed comprehensively in order to understand the activities within the coaching programs, starting from the program design until the program completion (Mawardi, 2019;Rohyani, Herpratiwi, & Djasmi, 2014).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes

Aldapit

Suharjana

2019

PETiER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate the training programs of sprinting, middle distance running, and long distance running athletes. This type of research is the study evaluation using CIPP models. The approach used in this study is a qualitative approach with qualitative data analysis model of Miles & Huberman. The results of the evaluation include: (1) context evaluation shows that there are lack of budget, facilities, government’s support, sponsorship, health experts, test instrumens and test spaces, (2) evaluation of the inputt indicates there is a lack of facilities and infrastructure as the main support of the running track, (3) evaluation of the process demonstrates the ability of trainers to implement the training process is very helpful to the achievement of a good coaching program and achievements of athletes. The recruitment of athletes should be open to all people, so there should not be the impression of nepotism and collusion, (4) evaluation of the product shows the achievements have been at national and international level. Achievement would be better and more sustainable if supported by a context and a perfect addition of the input to the process which has been good.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes

Aldapit

Suharjana

2019

PETiER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The criteria may vary, depending on the specific circumstances of teaching and learning contexts. Many useful approaches and checklists for evaluation criteria have been proposed by Ellis (1997), Shaw (1998), McGrath (2002), Tomlinson (2003), Nuruhidin, Putra, Pamungkas, Ardiyanto, and Saputro (2018). The difference of criteria stems from different particular ELT contexts.…”

Section: Evaluation Criteria Of Good Textbookmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eight-grade English textbooks evaluation in Tegal, Central Java

Prawestri

2019

JELP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research is aimed at measuring whether the three books used in the secondary schools in Tegal i.e “Mandiri: Practise Your English Competence”, “Interactive English 2”, and “New Headway” are right or not, and revealing the strength and weaknesses of the three books based on the theories of excellent textbook developed by the researcher based on the Tomlinson’s (2003) framework. This research is evaluation research. The data were collected through observation, questionnaire, and document analysis. The data were analysed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldana's flow model of qualitative data research, which includes data collection, data reduction, data display, and giving the conclusion. The study found out that “Mandiri: Practise Your Sentence" meets only in language level criteria of excellent textbook, "Interactive English 2" all the five criteria, and "New Headway" meets three criterias. The research also found out that the strength of "Mandiri: Practise Your Sentence" relies on its language level, which is understandable and straightforward for the eighth graders. Its main weaknesses lie in the number of tests in every unit which does not cover all the skills learnt, and it does not have an excellent form of illustrations, all are too simple and uninteresting for the eighth graders. The strength of "Interactive English 2" lies in its colourful and attractive photos and cartoons that attract the students and its use of authentic text that is trendy in graphic design. Its main weakness lies in its focus on controlled practice. Meanwhile, the strength of "New Headway" comes from the attractive illustration and its use of communicative activities at the activities to make the students more creative and active in the classroom. But the main weakness lies in its sentences, which are too hard to understand for the eighth graders in Tegal.

show abstract

“…In relation to evaluation, CIPP Model stands for Context, Input, Process and Product Approach Model, which has been developed by Stufflebeam and Shinkfield (1985). The CIPP Model basically provides very systematic manner in viewing multiple aspects on the process of curriculum development (Nuruhidin et al, 2018;Patil & Kalekar, 2014). As a result, users who adopt the CIPP model will be enabled to evaluate schools under very comprehensive manner (Aldapit & Suharjana, 2019;Hamalik, 2002, pp.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sports education learning program evaluation in senior high school

Sulistyawati

Guntur

2019

PETiER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Sports Education learning program evaluation has not been completely implemented. In relation to the statement, the study aims at evaluating the Sports Education learning program in Senior High School degree. Within the conduct of the study, the evaluation involved the CIPP model. Then, the informants for the study consisted of principals, vice principals, 2 Sports Education teachers and 10 students from each of Grade X, Grade XI and Grade XII. The data were gathered by means of interview, observation and documentation. For the data analysis technique, the researcher adopted the descriptive qualitative analysis. The results of the assessment in the study show that the results of context evaluation have already contained the Core Competence and the Basic Competence from 2013 Curriculum. The Components of Input have been good and the learning process of Soccer has been well-performing. Furthermore, the Components of Output show that the mean score of Core Competence 1 and Core Competence 2 belong to the “Good” category, Core Competence 3 belongs to the “Very Good” category (82.24) and Core Competence 4 belongs to the “Good” category (80.50). Therefore, it might be concluded that the Sports Education learning program in Senior High School has been well implemented. Thus, it is recommended that the Sports Education learning program should be continued with several revisions on the process.

show abstract

Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes

CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes

Eight-grade English textbooks evaluation in Tegal, Central Java

Sports education learning program evaluation in senior high school

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About