2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-015-0595-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric evaluation of the negative syndrome of schizophrenia

Abstract: In this paper, we reviewed the available instruments for assessing the negative syndrome of schizophrenia, describing their strengths and weaknesses. Current instruments were classified into two categories according to their content validity and assessment approach as first- or second-generation instruments. The BPRS, SANS, the SENS and the PANSS belong to the first generation, while the BNSS, the CAINS and the MAP-SR belong to the second generation. The NSA can be considered a transitional instrument between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(81 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing rating scales can be divided into older, first-generation and newer, second-generation tools (Marder and Kirkpatrick, 2014). First-generation tools, such as the PANSS negative subscale, BPRS, and SANS are limited in that they do not capture all negative symptoms (such as asociality, avolition, and anhedonia), and rely more heavily on behavior for assessment rather than internal experiences (Paz Garcia-Portilla et al, 2015). The PANSS, a comprehensive scale to asses psychopathology (Kay et al, 1987), was not designed to measure negative symptoms independently (Marder and Kirkpatrick, 2014).…”
Section: Potential Sources Of Heterogeneity In Extant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing rating scales can be divided into older, first-generation and newer, second-generation tools (Marder and Kirkpatrick, 2014). First-generation tools, such as the PANSS negative subscale, BPRS, and SANS are limited in that they do not capture all negative symptoms (such as asociality, avolition, and anhedonia), and rely more heavily on behavior for assessment rather than internal experiences (Paz Garcia-Portilla et al, 2015). The PANSS, a comprehensive scale to asses psychopathology (Kay et al, 1987), was not designed to measure negative symptoms independently (Marder and Kirkpatrick, 2014).…”
Section: Potential Sources Of Heterogeneity In Extant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the pathomorphism of the "classic" clinical picture of the disease, the similarity of a number of symptoms with manifestations of other nosological forms [4]. Of particular importance in preventing diagnostic and expert mistakes in assessing the negative symptoms of schizophrenia are specific research methods, such as qualification scales [5,6]. There are a large number of scales to evaluate it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of previous scales for assessing negative symptoms has been questioned [15,16]. Subsequently, the NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement called for the development of a new instrument that more accurately reflects current concepts of negative symptoms [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement called for the development of a new instrument that more accurately reflects current concepts of negative symptoms [17]. In response, the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) was created with increased validity [15,18]. A review by Lavelle et al [19] noted that variations between past findings may be linked not only with differences in assessment methods, but also with the heterogeneity of samples used both within and across studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%