Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Neuroticism Subscale of the NEO-PI

Abstract

Neuroticism is an important concept in psychology, self-report measures of neuroticism are important for both research and clinical practice. The neuroticism subscale of the Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) is a brief measure of neuroticism, and it was widely used in the world. This study was aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the neuroticism subscale of the NEO-PI. A total of 5,494 undergraduates from three universities and 551 clinical patients with mental disorders from a psychological clinic had completed the Chinese version of the neuroticism subscale of the NEO-PI. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine how well the three hypothetical models fit the data and the measurement equivalence of neuroticism subscale across gender. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also evaluated. Both the six-facet model and the bi-factor model (six-facet model with one general factor) achieved satisfactory fit, while the six-facet model had best fit (Undergraduate sample: TLI = 0.919, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.044, SRMR = 0.033; Clinical sample: TLI = 0.921, CFI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.041), and it had measurement equivalence across gender. The neuroticism subscale also showed acceptable internal consistency and good stability. Within the undergraduate sample, there were statistically significant gender differences in neuroticism total scores and scores of six facets, while there were no significant gender differences in the neuroticism scores in the clinical sample. Both in the undergraduate sample and the clinical sample, anxiety facet, depression facet and vulnerability facet of the neuroticism subscale significantly predicted the depression level, while anxiety facet, angry-hostility facet and vulnerability facet significantly predicted the anxiety level. In conclusion, the Chinese version of the neuroticism subscale is a reliable and valid measurement of neuroticism in both undergraduate and clinical population.

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the 10-Item Ruminative Response Scale Among Undergraduates and Depressive Patients

“…In clinical samples, the strict equivalence was not supported. But the residual equivalence is the most strict equivalence limit and it is not necessary for most research (59). In summary, the results of this study confirmed that the Chinese RRS-10 has strong equivalence, indicating that the scale is effective and interpretable between gender groups.…”

Mapping Chinese Personality: An Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the NEO-PI-3 in Monolingual and Bilingual Studies

“…Researchers have also examined the structure of the facet scales and extended this research into different populations. Testing the N facet scales in both clinical and nonclinical samples in mainland China, Xi et al (2018) found support for the original six-facet structure, with acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Using differential item functioning, Dai et al (2010) assessed the measurement invariance of the C facet scales in a U.S. sample and a mainland Chinese sample.…”

The relationship between postpartum negative life events and postpartum depression: a moderated mediation model of neuroticism and psychological flexibility

“…The neuroticism subscale of the short version of the Big Five Personality scale, compiled by Costa et al [ 42 ], was adopted, which has been proved to have good reliability and validity in Chinese samples [ 43 ]. The scale uses 12 items, each one rated on a five-point scale.…”