2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40519-013-0010-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Drive for Muscularity Scale in Mexican males

Abstract: This study refers to the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Drive for Muscularity Scale among Mexican population. The exploratory factor analysis was carried out with 369 university males (mean age = 20.93 years). A three-factor structure that explains 45.64 % of the variance was found for the scale: 31.10 % by attitudes (α = 0.87), 10.70 % by substance intake (α = 0.72) and 3.84 % by training adherence (α = 0.68). Only the two first sub-scales and total score (α = 0.86) offered acceptable levels… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
1
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
20
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicated that the two-factor model proposed by McCreary et al (2004) had adequate fit in the present sample. This is consistent with previous reports that this two-factor structure had adequate-to-good fit in Argentine (Compte et al, 2015), German, (Waldorf et al, 2014), and Mexican (Escoto et al, 2013). It is also broadly consistent with the derived factor structure in Brazilian men (Campana et al, 2013), although in that study three items were deleted to reach adequate fit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results indicated that the two-factor model proposed by McCreary et al (2004) had adequate fit in the present sample. This is consistent with previous reports that this two-factor structure had adequate-to-good fit in Argentine (Compte et al, 2015), German, (Waldorf et al, 2014), and Mexican (Escoto et al, 2013). It is also broadly consistent with the derived factor structure in Brazilian men (Campana et al, 2013), although in that study three items were deleted to reach adequate fit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…More specifically, using CFA, we tested two models of the factor structure of the DMS: (i) the original two-factor model consisting of Muscularity-Oriented Body Image Attitudes and Muscularity-Oriented Behaviours (McCreary et al, 2004), and; (ii) a one-dimensional model where all items loaded onto a single latent variable (McCreary et al, 2004). Although three factor models are available for testing (Campana et al, 2013;Escoto et al, 2013), these either do not show adequate fit or have problems associated with stability. For these reasons, we focused on the parent factor structures in the present work.…”
Section: Drive For Muscularity Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La validación en adolescentes mexicanos mostró características psicométri-cas adecuadas (α = 0.93) y una estructura en seis factores (varianza total = 54.6%). 29 El Cuestionario de Deseo por la Musculatura de McCreary (DM), 30 validado en población mexicana por Escoto et al, 31 cuenta con 15 preguntas con seis opciones de respuesta tipo Likert. Esta escala cuenta con un alfa de Cronbach total de 0.86, se divide en tres factores que explican el 45.64% de la varianza total con valores de consistencia interna de 0.88, 0.77 y 0.68.…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified
“…This instrument was translated into various languages demonstrating good psychometric properties. The drive for muscularity scale was validated in the samples of Asian American (Keum et al, 2015), Scottish (McPherson, McCarthy, McCreary, & McMillan, 2010), Malay (Swami et al, 2016), Romanian (Swami, Vintila, Tudorel, Goian, & Barron, 2018), Argentinian (Compte, Sepúlveda, de Pellegrin, & Blanco, 2015), Mexican (Escoto et al, 2013), French (Chaba et al, 2018), Italian (Nerini, Matera, Baroni, & Stefanile, 2016), Spanish (Sepulveda et al, 2016) samples of men. The majority of studies demonstrated good psychometric properties of the instrument (Kling, Kwakkenbos, Diedrichs, Rumsey, Frisén, et al, 2019…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%