2015
DOI: 10.5812/ijhrba.21560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Language Version of Yang Internet Addiction Questionnaire: An Explanatory Factor Analysis

Abstract: Background:Reliability and validity are the key concepts in measurement processes. Young internet addiction test (YIAT) is regarded as a valid and reliable questionnaire in English speaking countries for diagnosis of Internet-related behavior disorders.Objectives:This study aimed at validating the Persian version of YIAT in the Iranian society.Patients and Methods:A pilot and a cross-sectional study were conducted on 28 and 254 students of Qom University of Medical Sciences, respectively, in order to validate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total score of each participant was categorized into one of these classes: healthy (score 0 -19), at risk (score 20 -49), moderate dependence (score 50 -79) and severe dependence (score 80 -100) (24). The Persian version of this questionnaire was used in this study (25).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total score of each participant was categorized into one of these classes: healthy (score 0 -19), at risk (score 20 -49), moderate dependence (score 50 -79) and severe dependence (score 80 -100) (24). The Persian version of this questionnaire was used in this study (25).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by three experts using the content validity index (0.84), and its reliability was confirmed using the test-retest (0.88) by 20 medical students using Cronbach's alpha (0.87) within two weeks. The reliability and validity of this tool have been reported above 90% in previous studies (34)(35)(36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Furthermore, the validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by three experts using the content validity index (0.84), and its reliability was confirmed using the test-retest (0.88) by 20 medical students using Cronbach's alpha (0.87) within two weeks. The reliability, as well as the validity of this tool, have reported above 90% in previous studies [31,[33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%