Psychometric Properties of the <scp>B</scp>ody <scp>I</scp>mage <scp>S</scp>cale in <scp>T</scp>urkish Ostomy Patients

Edeer, Aylin Durmaz; Süler, Gülseren; Dorum, Hatice; Harputlu, Deniz; Vural, Fatma; Üçer, Ceylanım

doi:10.1111/2047-3095.12049

Cited by 16 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two-factor solution for mastectomy subgroup: appearance/attractiveness (26.9% of variance) and body satisfaction (18.8% of variance) but results were not reproducible. Excellent + Karayurt et al [ 32 ] EFA, CFA One-factor solution, fit statistics were acceptable. SRMR: 0.05; CFI: 0.96.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…One study validated the BIS in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery [ 19 ]. The study populations were breast cancer patients [ 14 , 17 , 33 ], colorectal cancer patients [ 19 ], patients with an ostomy (included because 82% of the population were cancer patients) [ 32 ], or a mixed cancer population (including breast, gynecological, gastro-intestinal, genitourinary, head and neck, hematologic, and respiratory cancer) [ 18 , 31 ]. We report on the results based on data extracted from nine studies addressing structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, seven studies examined structural validity using exploratory factor analyses (EFA) [ 14 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 31 – 33 ] and three studies performed an additional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) [ 16 , 31 , 32 ] (Table 2 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In subgroup analyses, a two-factor structure was found among breast cancer patients after mastectomy [ 14 ] and breast cancer patients after surgery with immediate breast reconstruction [ 33 ]. Three fair quality studies also reported a one-factor solution [ 17 , 31 , 32 ] and one fair quality study reported a two-factor solution [ 16 ] among breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. In the poor quality study [ 19 ], a multi-trait item analysis was performed.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients

Melissant

Neijenhuijs

Jansen³

et al. 2018

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionBody image is acknowledged as an important aspect of health-related quality of life in cancer patients. The Body Image Scale (BIS) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate body image in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to systematically review measurement properties of the BIS among cancer patients.MethodsA search in Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed to identify studies that investigated measurement properties of the BIS (Prospero ID 42017057237). Study quality was assessed (excellent, good, fair, poor), and data were extracted and analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology on structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Evidence was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate.ResultsNine studies were included. Evidence was sufficient for structural validity (one factor solution), internal consistency (α = 0.86–0.96), and reliability (r > 0.70); indeterminate for measurement error (information on minimal important change lacked) and responsiveness (increasing body image disturbance in only one study); and inconsistent for hypothesis testing (conflicting results). Quality of the evidence was moderate to low. No studies reported on cross-cultural validity.ConclusionThe BIS is a PROM with good structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, but good quality studies on the other measurement properties are needed to optimize evidence. It is recommended to include a wider variety of cancer diagnoses and treatment modalities in these future studies.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-018-4145-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients

Melissant

Neijenhuijs

Jansen³

et al. 2018

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Often, these tools are intended to measure the quality of life of patients. 17,21,22,23 However, valid tools for evaluating patient outcomes in the early postoperative period are very limited. In this study, it was evaluated whether or not the Turkish version of OCSI is a valid and reliable tool to follow up on the complications 30 days after stoma surgery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Pittman Ostomy Complication Severity Index

Arslantaş¹,

Karahan²,

Büyükuysal³

2020

tjcd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amaç: Bu çalışma Pittman Ostomi Komplikasyon Şiddet indeksinin Türkçe geçerliliğini ve güvenilirliğinin incelenmesi amacı ile yapıldı. Yöntem: Metodolojik tipte olan bu araştırma, Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi'nde yer alan bir sağlık uygulama ve araştırma merkezinin stomaterapi ünitesinde 1 Ocak 2017-1 Ocak 2018 tarihleri arasında yürütüldü. Araştırmanın örneklemini en az bir aydır kolostomi ve ileostomiye sahip olan 90 ostomili birey oluşturdu. Araştırmada Stomalı Birey İzlem Formu ve Pittman Ostomi Komplikasyon Şiddet indeksi formu kullanıldı. Ameliyat öncesinde hastaların demografik özellikleri, ameliyattan sonraki ilk 24 saat içerisinde stoma ile ilgili özellikleri, ameliyattan 30 gün sonra ostomi bölgesi "Pittman Ostomi Komplikasyon Şiddet indeksi'ne" göre değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel analizlerinde SPSS 19,0 ve Excel 2016 paket programları kullanıldı. Bulgular: Ostomili bireylerin yaş ortalamasının 60,22±13,23; %44,4'ü kadın, %55,6'sı erkek, %90'ının evli, %71,1'inin ilkokul mezunu, %41,1'inin ev hanımı olduğu belirlendi. İndeksin dil geçerliliği için çeviri-geri çevirisi yapıldı. Kapsam geçerliliği için 11 uzmandan görüş alındı ve kapsam geçerlilik indeksinin 0,95 olduğu belirlendi. İndeksin yapı geçerliliği için komplikasyonla ilişkili parametreler Pittman Ostomi Komplikasyon Şiddet indeksi toplam puan arasındaki anlamlılık hesaplandı. Pittman Ostomi Komplikasyon Şiddet indeksinin güvenilirliği bağımsız gözlemciler arası uyum ile değerlendirildi. Uzman görüşlerinde gözlemciler arasındaki uyum incelendiğinde dil bakımından uyum olduğu görüldü (p<0,001; Kendall's Aim: This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Pittman Ostomy Complication Severity index.

show abstract

Body image assessment in oncology: an update review

Muzzatti

Annunziata

2016

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Psychometric Properties of the Body Image Scale in Turkish Ostomy Patients

Abstract: The Turkish version of the Body Image Scale is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating body image in Turkish ostomy patients.

Cited by 16 publications

References 29 publications

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Pittman Ostomy Complication Severity Index

Body image assessment in oncology: an update review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About