Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Semistrukturierten Interviews zur Erfassung der DSM-5 Persönlichkeitsfunktionen (STiP-5.1)

Zettl, Max; Taubner, Svenja; Hutsebaut, Joost; Volkert, Jana

doi:10.1055/a-1010-6887

Cited by 38 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The findings regarding reliability are in line with the original study of the STiP‐5.1 with high internal consistency—Cronbach's α = 0.97 (Hutsebaut et al, 2017). Previous studies reported satisfactory interrater reliability (ICC) measuring the degree of agreement among interviewers (ranging in total from 0.58 to 0.92; Hutsebaut et al, 2017; Zettl et al, 2019). Due to organizational reasons and a 1:1 setting, with no audio or visual recordings, it was not possible to include this measure into our study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Semi‐structured interview for personality functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1): Psychometric evaluation of the Czech version

Heissler

Doubková

Hutsebaut

et al. 2021

Personality & Mental Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The DSM‐5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders introduced a dimensional perspective on personality disorders and their assessment by measuring personality functioning in the following domains: Identity, Self‐Direction, Empathy, and Intimacy. This study provides a replication of the psychometric evaluation of the Semi‐Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1) within a mixed clinical sample and a community sample. The sample consisted of 188 adults: 86 participants from the general population and 102 people from a mixed clinical sample. All participants completed the STiP‐5.1 and Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form (LPFS‐BF 2.0). Results showed good internal consistency (McDonald's ω = 0.89–0.94) and promising convergent validity (correlations with LPFS‐BF 2.0 above 0.6) of the STiP‐5.1. Its scores differentiated participants within the community sample from those in the mixed clinical sample with large effect sizes (rrb = 0.77–0.88). Moreover, the impairment in personality functioning was more pronounced in people with personality disorders than in other psychiatric disorders (medium effect size, rrb = 0.46–0.57), supporting the notion of a continuum of personality functioning impairment. The STiP‐5.1 therefore offers an instrument with satisfactory psychometric properties for the assessment of personality functioning both for research and clinical practice.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Semi‐structured interview for personality functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1): Psychometric evaluation of the Czech version

Heissler

Doubková

Hutsebaut

et al. 2021

Personality & Mental Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is significantly associated with overall symptom severity and the diagnosis of a personality disorder (Ehrenthal et al, 2012), but also other measures of personality difficulties (Zimmermann et al, 2014;König et al, 2016). Even more importantly, it correlates with OPD personality functioning expert ratings (r = 0.62; Dinger et al, 2019), and its 12-item short version (Ehrenthal et al, 2015) also with DSM-5 LPFS interview ratings (r = 0.78; Zettl et al, 2019). Initial adaptation and validation of the instrument for Chile (De la Parra et al, 2018) shows from an acceptable to high internal consistency scores (α = 0.71-0.93 for subscales).…”

Section: Personality Functioning (Opd-sq)mentioning

confidence: 97%

Risk Factors for Adult Depression: Adverse Childhood Experiences and Personality Functioning

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Depressive disorder is one of the main health problems worldwide. Many risk factors have been associated with this pathology. However, while the association between risks factors and adult depression is well established, the mechanisms behind its impact remains poorly understood. A possible, yet untested explanation is the mediating impact of levels of personality functioning, i.e., impairments with regard to self and interpersonal.Method: Around 162 patients were assessed at the beginning of their therapy, with regard to risk factors, such as sociodemographic, physical, hereditary (Information Form), and adverse childhood experiences (ACE; CTQ). Depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI) and personality functioning (OPD-SQ) were also measured. Associations between the related variables as well as other possible covariates were examined by means of zero-order correlations and bootstrapping-based mediation analysis.Results: Of all the risk factors taken into account, level of education and physical illness were associated with depression. On the other hand, the most significant predictor of depressive symptomatology was ACE, and this relationship was mediated by personality functioning. This indicates that patients presenting adverse childhood experiences are more likely to develop deficiencies in personality functioning, which in turn increases their likelihood of developing depressive symptomatology.Conclusion: These results reaffirm the importance of incorporating risk and vulnerability factors such as personality functioning in understanding depression.

show abstract

“…Additionally, two structured interview schedules have been designed to specifically address the 12 facets of the LPFS: the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders module I [SCID-5-AMPD-I; (12)] and the Semi-Structured Interview for DSM-5 Personality functioning [STiP-5.1; (13,14)]. Both interview schedules showed promising results regarding reliability and validity of assessments of personality functioning (14)(15)(16).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of ICD-11 Personality Disorder Severity in Forensic Patients Using the Semi-structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1): Preliminary Findings

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In forensic settings, several challenges may affect reliability of assessment of personality pathology, specifically when based upon self-report. This study investigates the Semi-Structured Interview for DSM-5 Personality Functioning (STiP-5.1) to assess level of severity of personality functioning in incarcerated patients. Thirty inpatients of three forensic psychiatric facilities completed the STiP 5.1 and additionally completed self-report questionnaires assessing symptom severity, personality functioning and traits. Staff members completed informant versions of personality functioning questionnaires. Previously assessed community (N = 18) and clinical samples (N = 80) were used as a reference. Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the STiP 5.1 were good. As expected, no associations were found between self-report and expert-ratings (STiP 5.1) of personality functioning. Remarkably, no associations were found between informant rated personality functioning and the STiP 5.1. This study confirms the discrepancies between self-report and expert-ratings in forensic settings and identifies the need to design and test assessment instruments within this context instead of generalizing findings obtained in regular mental health care samples. The STiP-5.1 may be a candidate for use in forensic samples, particularly to guide treatment planning and individual patient policy, although it remains unclear what specific information it offers above and beyond self-report and informant-report.

show abstract

Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Semistrukturierten Interviews zur Erfassung der DSM-5 Persönlichkeitsfunktionen (STiP-5.1)

Cited by 38 publications

References 26 publications

Semi‐structured interview for personality functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1): Psychometric evaluation of the Czech version

Semi‐structured interview for personality functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1): Psychometric evaluation of the Czech version

Risk Factors for Adult Depression: Adverse Childhood Experiences and Personality Functioning

Assessment of ICD-11 Personality Disorder Severity in Forensic Patients Using the Semi-structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1): Preliminary Findings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About