2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00365-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychopathy and sensitivity to the emotional polarity of metaphorical statements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, previous research has shown that metaphors can be used to isolate the ability to perceive emotional connotations of written language. Specifically, psychopaths are able to describe the literal meaning of metaphors as well as a control group can, but are not able to identify even their most basic emotional connotations (i.e., whether the metaphor was positive or negative; Hervé, Hayes, & Hare, 2003). This is consistent with theories that the connotative and denotative information in metaphors are processed separately (Coney & Lange, 2006;Searle, 1979).…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, previous research has shown that metaphors can be used to isolate the ability to perceive emotional connotations of written language. Specifically, psychopaths are able to describe the literal meaning of metaphors as well as a control group can, but are not able to identify even their most basic emotional connotations (i.e., whether the metaphor was positive or negative; Hervé, Hayes, & Hare, 2003). This is consistent with theories that the connotative and denotative information in metaphors are processed separately (Coney & Lange, 2006;Searle, 1979).…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…We started with the set of 60 metaphors that were used by Hervé et al (2003; 18 of which originally came from Katz, Paivio, Marschark, & Clark, 1988). They included 30 positive metaphors (e.g., "Love is an antidote for the world's ills") and 30 negative metaphors (e.g., "Man is a worm that lives on the corpse of the earth") and included both literary and nonliterary sources.…”
Section: Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, when asked to identify the emotion of the speaker based on prosody, psychopaths appear to be impaired in the recognition of fearful vocal affect . Psychopaths also have difficulty categorizing emotional metaphors (Herve et al, 2003). Evidence for abnormalities in language processing also comes from analyses of the speech of psychopathic individuals.…”
Section: Language Processes and Psychopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical settings a cut-off of 75% and above (e.g., 30 out of 40 points on the PCL-R) is used to define psychopaths (Herve et al, 2001) and below 50%, (e.g., <20 out of 40 on the PCL-R) to define non-psychopaths (Blair et al, 1995;Richell et al, 2003). A low psychopathy score is thus deemed to be in the range 0-19 and a moderate score 20-29 for the full version of the checklist (PCL-R) while these same cut-off scores are 0-12 (out of 24) and 13-17 (out of 24) for the Psychopathy Checklist Screening Version (PCL:SV) (Guy and Douglas, 2006).…”
Section: Research Conductedmentioning
confidence: 99%