The role of psychopathic tendencies and intelligence on Quality of life (QoL) ratings in different male offender groups was explored. Participants were 199 Swedish males with a history of criminality at age 11-14 and matched controls from the longitudinal project Young Lawbreakers as Adults. Based on registered crimes prior to 15 years and up to 34 years of age, four criminal groups were yielded: non-criminals (NC); adolescence-limited (AL); persistent (P); and adult-onset (AO). The QoL construct consists of the following dimensions: Self-perception, Psychological health, Family, Children, Education, Work, and Finances, all self-rated at age 38-41 when also psychopathic tendencies were clinically assessed using the Psychopathy Check List (PCL). The P group reported lower QoL in all dimensions compared to the NC and AL groups and lower QoL regarding Family and Education than the AO group. When controlling for psychopathic tendencies, the group differences in QoL regarding Self-perception and Children was no longer significant. Generally, individuals with higher IQ scores rated higher QoL than individuals with lower IQ scores. IQ however did not explain the divergence in QoL between offender groups. Psychopathic tendencies are suggested to overtake the importance of group belonging regarding the QoL dimensions of Self-perception and Children. In a previous study, individuals with psychopathic tendencies reported their quality of life (QoL) significantly lower than individuals without psychopathic tendencies [1]. Additional contemporary work has shown similar findings among violent offenders and individuals with personality disorders, i.e. they rate poor subjective QoL [2,3]. It is also known that psychopathic personality traits are associated with a wide range of negative health outcomes [4]. Our understanding of psychopathy, a personality disorder with very poor treatment prognosis, may be enriched by improving the insights of how individuals with psychopathic tendencies perceive their QoL [5]. Thus, shedding light on how individuals with psychopathic tendencies rate their QoL may gain entrance into where resources of more successful areas of treatment can be placed for this hard to treat group. Treatments aimed at improving QoL have shown to be an effective choice in other areas of research for individuals whose psychopathology is not affected by other routine treatment methods [6,7]. Since previous research have shown that individuals with psychopathic tendencies self-rate poorer QoL compared to individuals without those traits, this point to an area in these individuals' lives that might have some potential for improvement [1]. Thus, rather than focusing on changing the core traits of psychopathy, the emphasis may be placed on improving their QoL. This incorporates treatment that takes the 'whole individual's well-being' into account and might thus boost motivation to enter and stay in treatment since it is based on the individual's self-expressed view of his or her life quality. Bouman and colleagues ...