2019
DOI: 10.1111/eip.12858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosis screening in schools: Considerations and implementation strategies

Abstract: Aim: Duration of untreated psychosis, or the time between onset of psychosis symptoms and accurate diagnosis and treatment, is a significant predictor of both initial treatment response and long-term outcomes. As such, efforts to improve rapid identification are key. Because early signs of psychosis commonly emerge in adolescence, schools have the potential to play an important role in the identification of psychosis-spectrum disorders.Methods: To illustrate the potential role of schools in this effort, the cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…School settings that provide broad social-emotional support were better able to implement screening with a wide array of students compared with special education services, but they still struggled with parent engagement to obtain consent for treatment referral. 24 In a related qualitative study, we identified ethical concerns, logistics, screening population, and stigma as factors contributing to feasibility of screening in school settings. 24 Fewer cases, and likely shorter DUP, would be expected overall in schools where screening was a selected prevention strategy compared with the indicated prevention approach in CMHCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School settings that provide broad social-emotional support were better able to implement screening with a wide array of students compared with special education services, but they still struggled with parent engagement to obtain consent for treatment referral. 24 In a related qualitative study, we identified ethical concerns, logistics, screening population, and stigma as factors contributing to feasibility of screening in school settings. 24 Fewer cases, and likely shorter DUP, would be expected overall in schools where screening was a selected prevention strategy compared with the indicated prevention approach in CMHCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BASC‐2 is a consistent, reliable tool that is designed for and standardized in college settings within and outside of the U.S. (Ahn, Ebesutani, & Kamphaus, 2014; Nowinski et al, 2008). Efforts are currently underway to implement psychosis‐spectrum screening into K‐12 schools (Meyer et al, 2019), and the BASC‐2, in both self‐ and parent‐report forms, may be helpful in these efforts for earlier identification (Thompson et al, 2013, 2014). Given these results and pending further research, similar identification efforts in colleges/universities may also consider the BASC‐2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ocena przesiewowa na terenie szkoły jest możliwa, choć wiąże się z wieloma logistycznymi trudnościami i koniecznością analizy kwestii etycznych, jak opisują to Meyer i wsp. [25]) lub uwzględniać osoby poszukujące pomocy. Opieka powinna być kompleksowa, a świadczenia ośrodków wczesnej interwencji adresowane są często do adolescentów i młodych dorosłych.…”
Section: Wczesna Interwencja W Pierwszym Epizodzie Psychotycznym U Ch...unclassified