Psychotraumatologie und Psychoanalyse

Fischer, Gottfried; Riedesser, Peter

doi:10.1007/s00451-006-0272-y

Cited by 23 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is important to note that in DSM‐V, the subjective response as part of the traumatic stressor criterion has been removed, which objectifies the traumatic stressor criterion. Trauma itself is defined as a direct reaction to a stressor that exceeds an individual's capacity to cope or, in other words, as the vital experience of a discrepancy between threatening situation factors and individual coping mechanisms . Secondary trauma, also called compassion fatigue, is defined as indirect exposure to trauma through a firsthand account or narrative of a traumatic event .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cancer Diagnosis: A Trauma for Patients and Doctors Alike

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cancer Diagnosis: A Trauma for Patients and Doctors Alike

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The threatening power of a potentially traumatizing event thus always has to be considered in relation to a person's potential to cope with it (Fischer and Riedesser 1998). In many therapeutic approaches, priority is given to the construction (or imagination) of safe spaces and the development of resources that can strengthen resilience, rather than to a sometimes risky confrontation with the traumatic memory (Reddemann 2011).…”

Section: Trauma and Voicelessnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regaining a Place From Which to Speak and Be Heard: In Search of a Response to the “Violence of Voicelessness”

Busch

2016

SPILPLUS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is concerned with linguistic vulnerability to man-made trauma, displacement, and exclusion, as well as with strategies of resilience that valorise socially-depreciated resources within the linguistic repertoire. It focuses on an interview carried out within a transdisciplinary project which -from a medical, a psycho-therapeutical and a linguistic perspective -addressed interrelations between multilingualism, trauma and resilience. A close reading of the biographical narrative raises three main points. First, how a life in permanent precarity and suspense is lived as "violence of voicelessness" (Anthonissen) -as the loss of any acknowledged position from which one can relate oneself to the world by social action and interaction. Second, how the pressure of exclusion contributes to re-invoking earlier traumatic or stressful experiences. Finally, how (sometimes unexpected) linguistic resources can strengthen resilience. Such resources include an awareness of the potential that lies in what I would call a "heteroglossia of survival", in the possibility of mobilizing means of expression associated with the semiotic dimension of language (Kristeva), and in the struggle for recognition through which it becomes possible to re-position oneself, to regain a place from which to speak.

show abstract

“…Die frü-hen neurologisch-psychosomatischen Konzepte von Charcot, Janet und Freud [22][23][24][25][26] sind immer noch gültig, erfahren sogar zurzeit eine Renaissance. Aufgrund neuerer Forschungen zu PNEA [5,[27][28][29][30][31][32], zu anderen dissoziativen und somatoformen Störungen [33,34] sowie zur Psychotraumatologie [35][36][37] lassen sich diese Konzepte heute besser verstehen. Die Ergebnisse dieser Forschungen sollen deshalb hierkurzgefasst -genannt werden.…”

Section: Symptomdynamik Und Psychodynamikunclassified