Public attitudes towards gambling product harm and harm reduction strategies: an online study of 16–88 year olds in Victoria, Australia

Abstract

BackgroundGambling has quickly emerged as an important global public health issue. With new technologies used to develop high intensity gambling products and promotions aimed at driving consumption, public health organisations and researchers, community groups, and politicians have argued for a range of regulatory and education measures aimed at reducing gambling harm. However, there has been limited research seeking to understand community perceptions of the harms associated with gambling products and environments, and the level of community support for strategies designed to prevent and reduce gambling harm.MethodsAn online study of 500 adolescents and adults (aged 16 and over) was conducted with a representative sample (by age and gender) of individuals who were current residents in the state of Victoria, Australia. Participants were asked a range of questions about their own gambling behaviours, with the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) used as a measure of problem gambling. Participants were asked about their perceptions of harms associated with electronic gambling machines (EGMs), sports betting, horse betting, and casino gambling. They were also asked about the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with gambling harm reduction strategies related to marketing and promotions, restrictions on gambling products and venues, and public education campaigns. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and paired t tests, with thematic analysis used to interpret qualitative responses to open-ended questionnaire items.ResultsMore than one third (n = 201, 40.2%) of participants were at risk of experiencing some level of harm from gambling (PGSI ≥ 1), with 83 participants (16.6%) recording scores that indicated problem gambling (PGSI ≥ 8). One in five participants gambled on EGMs at least monthly (n = 100, 20.0%). Those who gambled on sports did so frequently, with nearly 1 in 5 gambling on sport at least once a month (n = 87, 17.4%). Over half of the sample rated casino gambling and EGMs as very harmful, while one third rated these forms of gambling as extremely harmful. Over one third of the sample rated horse and sports betting as very harmful, with one in five rating these products as extremely harmful. There was strong agreement with the need to ban gambling advertising during children’s viewing hours, during sporting matches and at sporting venues. The majority of participants agreed with reducing and restricting EGMs, and providing more public education for both adults and children about the negative consequences from gambling.ConclusionsThe findings suggest a strong perception in the Victorian community that gambling products are harmful. While governments have been reluctant to implement a comprehensive approach to reducing gambling harm, this study reveals significant community support for a range of harm reduction and prevention measures associated with gambling products. Public health practitioners can use this evidence in advocating for a comprehensive public health approach to r...

What do children observe and learn from televised sports betting advertisements? A qualitative study among Australian children

“…Although there is very limited research into sports betting, the recent Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia project (a nationally representative longitudinal study) found that 3% of participants gambled on sports at least monthly 4 . A Victorian study by Thomas and colleagues [2017] found that one‐third of participants had gambled on sports during the past twelve months, with 14% of these people gambling on sports at least weekly 5 . Roy Morgan Research [2016] found that 1 in 15 people who watched either the Australian Football League (AFL) or National Rugby League (NRL) grand finals placed a bet 6 .…”

“…The Australian government has recently made a commitment to restrict advertising during live sporting matches up to 8.30pm, although as yet this is no more than a commitment 15 . Recent research has shown that there is significant community support for complete bans of gambling advertising during sporting matches, including at sports stadiums, and strong public agreement that sporting organisations should take more responsibility for the promotion of gambling in sport 5 . While debates surrounding changes and updates to current regulations are ongoing, researchers have sought to identify: a) the range of specific creative strategies within advertisements that may appeal to children and; b) how promotional strategies used by the betting industry may shape the gambling attitudes and consumption intentions of children 10,16,17 …”

A public health advocacy approach for preventing and reducing gambling related harm

“…65 Community involvement in advocacy has seen advances in health policy in a variety of health policy contexts, including in the prevention of cancers and childhood obesity. 68 In Australia, the not-for-profit Alliance for Gambling Reform, involving 26 local government authorities in Victoria and New South Wales, is engaged in campaigns involving local communities to address gambling harm. 68 In Australia, the not-for-profit Alliance for Gambling Reform, involving 26 local government authorities in Victoria and New South Wales, is engaged in campaigns involving local communities to address gambling harm.…”

“…29,66,67 Given that the community is often in favour of gambling reform, it is important to provide opportunities for community members to engage in advocacy efforts. 68 In Australia, the not-for-profit Alliance for Gambling Reform, involving 26 local government authorities in Victoria and New South Wales, is engaged in campaigns involving local communities to address gambling harm. 34 It is critical that such initiatives continue.…”

Mapping and comparing French people’s positions regarding restrictive control policies: a pilot study

“…Individuals who are fully aware of the health risks associated with alcohol consumption tend to support restrictive control policies, and more so if they also believe in their effectiveness [21]. A majority of people agree with the view that gambling advertisements should be banned during sporting events and that more information about the risks associated with gambling should be provided to children and adolescents [22]. Direct experience of harm from close relatives who exhibit risky behaviors was also positively associated with support for control policies [21,[23][24][25].…”