2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38181-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Blockchains Scalability: An Examination of Sharding and Segregated Witness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ere are several solutions proposed in the literature to solve the scalability issue. In this study, we classify these solutions into three categories in Table 1 according to the blockchain technical logic architecture: Layer 0 solutions (e.g., BDN [8] and bloXroute [9]), Layer 1 solutions (e.g., Segregated Witness [10], DAG [11][12][13], sharding [14][15][16][17], and consensus [18][19][20]), and Layer 2 solutions (e.g., state channels [21], side chain [22], crosschain [23], and off-chain computation [24]). Layer 0 solutions are designed for improving the scalability by changing the underlying data transmission protocol of blockchain; Layer 1 solutions are designed for improving the scalability by changing the basic blockchain protocol such as block data structure, consensus algorithms, and incentive measures; and Layer 2 solutions are designed for improving the scalability through the off-chain methods at the application layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ere are several solutions proposed in the literature to solve the scalability issue. In this study, we classify these solutions into three categories in Table 1 according to the blockchain technical logic architecture: Layer 0 solutions (e.g., BDN [8] and bloXroute [9]), Layer 1 solutions (e.g., Segregated Witness [10], DAG [11][12][13], sharding [14][15][16][17], and consensus [18][19][20]), and Layer 2 solutions (e.g., state channels [21], side chain [22], crosschain [23], and off-chain computation [24]). Layer 0 solutions are designed for improving the scalability by changing the underlying data transmission protocol of blockchain; Layer 1 solutions are designed for improving the scalability by changing the basic blockchain protocol such as block data structure, consensus algorithms, and incentive measures; and Layer 2 solutions are designed for improving the scalability through the off-chain methods at the application layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New blockchain-based sharding solutions have been proposed in recent studies [10,[25][26][27][28]. Surveys of blockchain scalability [29][30][31][32][33][34] that only focused on vertical scaling and reducing overhead have been gradually taking blockchain sharding into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another action with the same goal that has been proposed is to reduce the size of transactions so that more of them can fit in a block. Such approaches have been implemented in Bitcoin Unlimited [16] and by Bitcoin's Segregated Witness [17], but neither of those methods has brought significant improvements to the situation.…”
Section: A Blockchain Scalability Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be possible to apply the proposed lightweight DL scheme directly to BC networks to reduce the data stored at each node, but this would require an additional protocol for the division of the BC encryption protocols between multiple nodes. Such protocols have been discussed in literature [15]. Let the total nodes in the network be represented by N .…”
Section: Application To Blockchain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%