Public Control of Armed Forces in the Russian Federation

Douglas, Nadja

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56384-8

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Note . Adopted from Douglas (2017, p. 184). CSMs = Committee of Soldiers’ Mothers; CSOs = civil society organizations; AGS = alternative civilian service; PCBs = public consultative bodies. a The typology’s structure was inspired by Danilova (2007, pp.…”

Section: Public Control As Social Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Top Down or Bottom Up? Public Control of the Armed Forces in Post–Soviet Russia

Douglas

2018

Armed Forces & Society

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article engages in an analysis of contemporary relations between civic actors and state power structures, notably the military organization, in the Russian Federation. The main focus is on the complex tension and interaction between state-sanctioned forms of control of the armed forces and public control, exercised by grassroots actors. The underlying assumption is that an institutionalization of control of state power structures is taking place in Russia. The article seeks to understand whether these processes are prevalently a top-down or a bottom-up phenomenon, how public control as a “civic duty” can be effectively characterized, and what implications this has for Russian civic activism more generally.

show abstract

Section: Public Control As Social Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Top Down or Bottom Up? Public Control of the Armed Forces in Post–Soviet Russia

Douglas

2018

Armed Forces & Society

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Public control and supervision in the economy: theoretical and legal justification

Agamagomedova

2023

Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Ûrid. nauki

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the context of the rapid processes of economy digitalization and integration, the issues of updating the forms and methods of public law impact on economic relations in the new modern conditions naturally arise. Taking into account the fact that control and supervision are traditionally positioned as basic management functions, the issues of substantiating public control and supervision in various areas of managerial influence in general and in the economic sphere in particular are becoming increasingly relevant. At the same time, the literature review allows to speak about the lack of common positions on the issues of structural and functional content of the category “public control and supervision in the economy”. In this regard, the purpose of the study is determined as the need for a theoretical and legal substantiation of the concept of public control and supervision in the economy, its structural and functional content and place in the general system of public administration. The materials for the study are the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of public control and supervision, their individual areas (public financial control, public environmental control, etc.). Various opinions on the structural and functional content of public control and supervision in the economy, its individual areas, assessment of the subject composition, goals and mechanisms for implementing such activities have formed the basis for classifying the existing scientific approaches to justification of public control and supervision in the economy. It is proposed to distinguish at least three approaches to such justification: from narrow (public control and supervision as control and supervision of public authorities) to two options for a broader approach (at the national and supranational levels). The latter seems relevant from the point of view of unification of states on economic basis and formation of regional markets for goods and services in the modern economic space.

show abstract

Rusya’nin Yakin Çevresi̇ni̇ Koruma Poli̇ti̇kasi Ve Soğuk Savaş İzleni̇mleri̇ (2008 Rusya-Gürci̇stan Savaşi Ve 2014 Ukrayna Kri̇zi̇)

ALPTEKİN

2022

R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kafkasya ve Karadeniz doğudan batıya uzanan enerji hatları açısından önemli bölgelerdir. Gürcistan veUkrayna ise bu bölgelerin hem NATO'nun hem de AB'nin güvenlik güvenlik politikalarında kritik bir konuma sahip ülkelerindendir. Söz konusu ülkeler gerek Batının enerji güvenliğini sağlamak gerekse Asya'nın batıya açılımını kontrol etmek için kilit noktalardan biridir. Bu noktalar aynı zamanda Rusya'nın yakın çevresinde yer almaktadır. 2008 Rusya-Gürcistan Savaşı ve 2014 Ukrayna Krizi, Rusya'nın Kafkasya, Karadeniz ve Doğu Avrupa gibi bölgelerde Sovyetler'in dağılmasından sonra meydana gelen güç boşluğunun kendisi dışında bir aktör tarafından doldurulmasına müsaade etmeyeceğini göstermiştir. Her ne kadar ABD ve AB günümüze kadar yumuşak güç kullanarak bölgede varlık göstermeye çalışmışsa da Rusya bunun karşılığında sert güç kullanmaktan çekinmemiştir. Bu izlenim dünyada Rusya ile ABD arasında yeni bir soğuk savaşın başladığını düşündürmüştür. Bu araştırma, somut veriler ışığında Rusya ile ABD arasında yaşananların mevcut uluslararası statükoyu bozma ve yeni bir soğuk savaşa yol açma potansiyelini incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu kapsamda Rusya'nın süper güç statüsüne yükselme ihtimali ve AB'nin muhtemel tepkileri de araştırılan konular arasındadır.

show abstract

Public Control of Armed Forces in the Russian Federation

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Top Down or Bottom Up? Public Control of the Armed Forces in Post–Soviet Russia

Top Down or Bottom Up? Public Control of the Armed Forces in Post–Soviet Russia

Public control and supervision in the economy: theoretical and legal justification

Rusya’nin Yakin Çevresi̇ni̇ Koruma Poli̇ti̇kasi Ve Soğuk Savaş İzleni̇mleri̇ (2008 Rusya-Gürci̇stan Savaşi Ve 2014 Ukrayna Kri̇zi̇)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About