2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2202.06969
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public data release of the FIRE-2 cosmological zoom-in simulations of galaxy formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 35 NIHAO galaxies presented in Buck (2020), only one shows a transition at the low metallicity seen in the data (g5.31e11). This result is in agreement with Belokurov & Kravtsov (2022), who find that the transition between hot and cold kinematics occurs too late in the Latte (Wetzel et al 2022) and Auriga (Grand et al 2018b) simulations. For the NIHAO simulations, mergers appear to be the main driver of the enhanced star formation efficiency and non-monotonic abundance behavior.…”
Section: Comparison To Simulationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Of the 35 NIHAO galaxies presented in Buck (2020), only one shows a transition at the low metallicity seen in the data (g5.31e11). This result is in agreement with Belokurov & Kravtsov (2022), who find that the transition between hot and cold kinematics occurs too late in the Latte (Wetzel et al 2022) and Auriga (Grand et al 2018b) simulations. For the NIHAO simulations, mergers appear to be the main driver of the enhanced star formation efficiency and non-monotonic abundance behavior.…”
Section: Comparison To Simulationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 14 shows evolution of halo mass defined within the density contrast 200 times the critical density, as well as the metallicity-age relation for stars and evolution of star formation rate for a sample of galaxies forming in Milky Way-sized haloes in the GRUMPY regulator model (Kravtsov & Manwadkar 2021) using mass accretion histories from the ELVIS suite of dark matter simulations (Garrison-Kimmel et al 2014), and cosmologi- cal zoom-in N -body+hydrodynamics simulations of several Milky Way-mass galaxies from the FIRE-2 simulation public data release 3 (Wetzel et al 2022). 4 , as well as the Auriga simulations available in the Aurigaia public release (Grand et al 2018).…”
Section: Evolution Of Stellar Mass Metallicity and Star Formation Rat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…edu/ananke/), FIRE-2 simulation public data (http:// flathub.flatironinstitute.org/fire), and Auriga (http://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/auriga/) simulation teams for making their simulation results publicly available. We use simulations from the FIRE-2 public data release (Wetzel et al 2022). The FIRE-2 cosmological zoom-in simulations of galaxy formation are part of the Feedback In Realistic Environments (FIRE) project, generated using the Gizmo code (Hopkins 2015) and the FIRE-2 physics model (Hopkins et al 2018).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data in these figures are available at https:// mbellardini.github.io/. The FIRE-2 simulations are publicly available (Wetzel et al 2022)…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%