2016
DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2016.1150320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public folklore dialogism and critical heritage studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical voices have become louder as debates on how to map and safeguard ICH in practice have taken place in various settings, but the debate on the "heritage process" has been ongoing for decades. Numerous scholars have pointed out that the political processes and debate surrounding the "safeguarding of cultural heritage" are frequently based on anachronistic understandings of culture, long rejected as "ideologically infested" and theoretically incoherent within the academic disciplines engaged in various fields of cultural studies (a far from extensive list includes: Adell, Tauschek, Bortolotto, Bendix, 2015;Assmann, 1995;Baron, 2016;Bendix, 1997;Foster, Gilman, Eds., 2015;Hafstein, 2009Hafstein, , 2018Harrison, 2013;Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, 1988Kurin, 2004;Kuutma, 2019;Leimgruber, 2010;Noyes, 2006Noyes, , 2012Ronström, Drakos, Engman, Eds., 2013;Smith, 2006;Smith, Agakawa, 2009;Zhang, Smith, 2019).…”
Section: Background Inventorying Ich In the Faroe Isl Andsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Critical voices have become louder as debates on how to map and safeguard ICH in practice have taken place in various settings, but the debate on the "heritage process" has been ongoing for decades. Numerous scholars have pointed out that the political processes and debate surrounding the "safeguarding of cultural heritage" are frequently based on anachronistic understandings of culture, long rejected as "ideologically infested" and theoretically incoherent within the academic disciplines engaged in various fields of cultural studies (a far from extensive list includes: Adell, Tauschek, Bortolotto, Bendix, 2015;Assmann, 1995;Baron, 2016;Bendix, 1997;Foster, Gilman, Eds., 2015;Hafstein, 2009Hafstein, , 2018Harrison, 2013;Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, 1988Kurin, 2004;Kuutma, 2019;Leimgruber, 2010;Noyes, 2006Noyes, , 2012Ronström, Drakos, Engman, Eds., 2013;Smith, 2006;Smith, Agakawa, 2009;Zhang, Smith, 2019).…”
Section: Background Inventorying Ich In the Faroe Isl Andsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am aware that there can be no final answers on how to best face up to the challenge, and that the dilemma has been framed as an unnecessarily antagonistic divide between "critical heritage scholars" and "public folklorists" as discussed by Robert Baron in his article from 2016. Baron suggests that both sides of the divide could learn from each other in order to get the most out of the Convention, benefitting both "communities" and scholarly fields (Baron, 2016). Baron comes to the, to me, somewhat surprising conclusion: that the main reason for the lack of general use of the insights and experiences built up over many decades of public folklore experience in the US within the safeguarding efforts of the UNESCO organization is due to the failure of the US to commit to the Convention.…”
Section: On C Lu Sionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where notions of co-production sometimes tend to emphasise a molding of perspectives into a single outcome (in other words, 'the' research or 'the' exhibition), we argue that co-production in a dialogic vein enables distinctions to be maintained, alternative views to be respected and a position from which diversity of outcomes may be welcomed. Robert Baron (2016) locates a tradition of dialogism within public folklore as a discipline in North America in the way that oral history and other performative aspects of culture have led folklorists to maintain a wide range of voices in their research rather than attempting to combine into a single authoritative account. Drawing on examples from the Smithsonian Folklife Festival and other public arts events, he writes: 'Dialogically constructed modes of presentation mutually engage folklorists, community members and audiences in representations of heritage to the public' (Baron, 2016: 593).…”
Section: Dialogical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These series are used to solve the various problems and difficulties well and correctly and recognized as national achievement [5,6]. Therefore, it must be well reserved [7], e.g. law protection [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%