2002
DOI: 10.1080/0811114022000032627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Housing Redevelopment: Opportunity for Community Regeneration?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a strand of research that extols the merits of tenant participation. So, for example, Hoatson and Grace (2002) and Arthurson's (2003) study of urban renewal projects in Australia, claim that tenant participation, particularly in the design process of a renewal project, can provide a vehicle for policymakers to establish sustainable neighbourhoods.…”
Section: The Sometimes Limited Aims Of Housing Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is a strand of research that extols the merits of tenant participation. So, for example, Hoatson and Grace (2002) and Arthurson's (2003) study of urban renewal projects in Australia, claim that tenant participation, particularly in the design process of a renewal project, can provide a vehicle for policymakers to establish sustainable neighbourhoods.…”
Section: The Sometimes Limited Aims Of Housing Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This paper will mainly focus on US programmes; however, it has implications for all nations who have moved toward a more marketbased, mixed income housing strategy. The US programmes might be unique in their more pronounced opposition from affluent residents; however, the degree that public housing residents achieve positive social outcomes in mixed income settings appears to be a concern among all nations involved in such programmes (see, for example, Kleit, 2005;Hoatson and Grace, 2002;Arthurson, 2002). Moreover, there is evidence that race and class relations are growing concerns around the world (Young, 1999), although there is some debate over the degree and implications of segregation in Europe (see Johnston et al, 2005;Simpson, 2004).…”
Section: Mixed Income Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Libson (2007), the residents' 'interests and desires were no longer a priority in the redevelopment of their community, and the number of subsidized units set to be included diminished from nearly 600 to, finally, less than 300' (p. 100). Hoatson and Grace (2002) contend that implementation strategies must consider the power differential between stakeholders and avoid tokenism. They suggest that public housing residents should contribute significantly to project plans, given that they are the ones who will be most directly impacted, and propose a proactive strategy for ensuring that residents are not barred from participation based on time and distance barriers.…”
Section: The Right To Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conflicts tend to be dominated by evictions and vertical clashes between civil society visà-vis the state or developers (Andri A, 2011;Sutanudjaja et al, 2019;Syafruddin & Adi, 2017); However, the redevelopment plan conflict in Rumah Susun Klender is different from the common cases. For example, public housing redevelopment issues outside Indonesia, such as Australia, where, despite the redevelopment receiving pro and cons from residents who were the target of the program, the redevelopment did not trigger an organized protest movement from resistance groups (Hoatson & Grace, 2002;Wynne & Rogers, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%