2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2528217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Information in Markov Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the approach of Kloosterman (), this asymmetric partnership game is modified with public signals. The set of signals is { b 1 , b 2 }, where b 1 is a signal that the beneficiary in the next period is player 1 and b 2 is a signal that the beneficiary in the next period is player 2.…”
Section: The Asymmetric Partnership Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following the approach of Kloosterman (), this asymmetric partnership game is modified with public signals. The set of signals is { b 1 , b 2 }, where b 1 is a signal that the beneficiary in the next period is player 1 and b 2 is a signal that the beneficiary in the next period is player 2.…”
Section: The Asymmetric Partnership Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2 from Kloosterman () says that cutoff discount factor decreases as ɛ increases . This is illustrated here by observing that the left hand side of the incentive constraint for state ( N , n ) is increasing in ɛ and δ so if ɛ increases, the cutoff discount factor decreases.…”
Section: The Asymmetric Partnership Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, none of these papers address our question of whether monitoring can be too precise, in that worse observability can actually help sustain collusion. 7 A recent paper by Kloosterman (2015) also makes the point that more information can make cooperation harder in a Markov game. However, Kloosterman assumes perfect monitoring of actions and perfect information about the current physical environment and examines the impact of more precise public information regarding the next period's physical environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%