2013
DOI: 10.3141/2361-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Opinions of Roadway Assets

Abstract: In October 2011, the North Carolina Department of Transportation conducted a roadway review with a randomly recruited sample of North Carolina residents and community leaders. More than 300 people from 61 communities participated in the surveys, which were held in six locations: Asheville, Burlington, Charlotte, Jonesville, Rocky Mount, and Wilmington. The purpose of the roadway review was twofold: to determine the expectations for the condition of North Carolina highways and to identify the features that Nort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the study outlined in this paper was developed to enhance asset management decisions by objectively determining the expectations that residents have of North Carolina's roadways and identifying the assets that residents believe are the most important on different types of roadways. This study, which builds on a method first used by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) in 2011, specifically relates quantifiable asset conditions to respondent perceptions in a way that allows them to be integrated into the performance management of transportation assets (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the study outlined in this paper was developed to enhance asset management decisions by objectively determining the expectations that residents have of North Carolina's roadways and identifying the assets that residents believe are the most important on different types of roadways. This study, which builds on a method first used by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) in 2011, specifically relates quantifiable asset conditions to respondent perceptions in a way that allows them to be integrated into the performance management of transportation assets (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%