2023
DOI: 10.26740/jsm.v7n2.p300-312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Policy Communication for Flood Management

Setiadi Setiadi,
Asep Sumaryana,
Herijanto Bekti
et al.

Abstract: Flood is a hydrometeorological disaster whose intensity and geographic scope continue to increase due to climate change, global warming, and lack of environmental management. Floods often need to be better managed through policy implementation and communication. This study reviews the communication of public policies for flood management. This review uses a traditional approach by referring to previous publications from articles and books, whereas analysis and synthesis refer to the qualitative methods. Public… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The p-value and t-value are not significant, mainly because changes in each class tend to vary in area, for instance, the dynamic nature of forest and cropland every 10 years, while other classes exhibit relatively smaller changes. Despite being statistically insignificant, analyzing the dynamics of LULC changes is imperative as they are intricately linked to spatial planning policies, disaster mitigation strategies, and environmental carrying capacity [ [47] , [48] , [49] ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p-value and t-value are not significant, mainly because changes in each class tend to vary in area, for instance, the dynamic nature of forest and cropland every 10 years, while other classes exhibit relatively smaller changes. Despite being statistically insignificant, analyzing the dynamics of LULC changes is imperative as they are intricately linked to spatial planning policies, disaster mitigation strategies, and environmental carrying capacity [ [47] , [48] , [49] ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%