2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CE model sets alternative options to present to the respondents and asks them to choose the most preferred among the alternative options using the random utility model [29]. The goods and services could be described as a series of attributes with their own levels and thus could capture the respondents' option decisions based on the utility function, with the preference obtained from the alternative option given [30].…”
Section: The Choice Experiments Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CE model sets alternative options to present to the respondents and asks them to choose the most preferred among the alternative options using the random utility model [29]. The goods and services could be described as a series of attributes with their own levels and thus could capture the respondents' option decisions based on the utility function, with the preference obtained from the alternative option given [30].…”
Section: The Choice Experiments Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the final CE questionnaire started in October of 2015. Based on the above discussion, seven characteristics were included as CE attributes in the design: agricultural farming type [24,25], biodiversity [6,16,26], water provision [12], land use type [6,10,13,26,27], ecotourism mode [13], WTP, and WTW [6,13,26,28], as well as the levels of the attributes in relation to ecosystem services, as shown in Table 1. Agricultural production provides nutrition and health for human society [29].…”
Section: Choice Of Experiments Design For the Land Use Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shoyama et al [10] designed the land use scenario, and integrated the natural forest, wetland, managed forest, and agricultural land into a program for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation. García-Llorente et al [13] showed that the best land use scenario for a semi-watershed integrates the attributes of cooperation, profit from selling forest products, such as timber, small trees for gardening, agricultural land, protected area, ecotourism, and river quality [18].…”
Section: Choice Of Experiments Design For the Land Use Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utility does not equal the goods and services directly but rather the attributes that they contain (Tawfik 2010). It assumes that when respondents are forced to choose between a collection of different attributes contained in alternative A or B, they will choose the alternative with greater total utility (Shoyama 2013 yet the cumulative effect of hundreds of thousands of boaters and anglers using the ecosystem creates stress that degrades the system. Such loss eventually impacts immediate gratification, because regular users will become discouraged by perceptions of impoverished water quality and fishing opportunities.…”
Section: Choice Modeling Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utility does not equal the goods and services directly but rather the attributes that they contain (Tawfik 2010). It assumes that when respondents are forced to choose between a selection of different attributes contained in alternative A or B, they will choose the alternative with greater total utility (Shoyama 2013). …”
Section: Section Iii: Coastal Management Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%