2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2003.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public preferences for health states with schizophrenia and a mapping function to estimate utilities from positive and negative symptom scale scores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] to group patients with schizophrenia into eight health states, based on the type and severity of symptoms experienced. Disease symptoms were grouped into three factors: negative (PANSS items G7, G16, N1–4 and N6), positive (G9, P1, P3, P5 and P6) and cognitive (G5, G10–13, G15, P2 and N5) [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[26] to group patients with schizophrenia into eight health states, based on the type and severity of symptoms experienced. Disease symptoms were grouped into three factors: negative (PANSS items G7, G16, N1–4 and N6), positive (G9, P1, P3, P5 and P6) and cognitive (G5, G10–13, G15, P2 and N5) [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease symptoms were grouped into three factors: negative (PANSS items G7, G16, N1–4 and N6), positive (G9, P1, P3, P5 and P6) and cognitive (G5, G10–13, G15, P2 and N5) [26]. Each of the eight HSs corresponded to a range of scores for the three factors, resulting in HSs characterised by discrete symptom profiles (with State 1 described as mild symptoms and State 8 as extremely severe symptoms) [26]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations