Public Satisfaction with the Health System and Popular Support for State Involvement in an East Asian Welfare Regime: Health Policy Legitimacy of Hong Kong

Abstract

The legitimacy of social policies has gained increasing attention in the past decade, against the backdrop of fiscal austerity and retrenchment in many nations. Policy legitimacy encompasses public preferences for the underlying principles of policies and the actual outcomes as perceived by citizens. Scholarly knowledge concerning the legitimacy of health policya major element of modern social policy architectureis, unfortunately, limited. This article seeks to extend the scholarly debates on health policy legitimacy from the West to Hong Kong, a member of the East Asian welfare state cluster. A bi-dimensional definition of health policy legitimacyencompassing both public satisfaction with the health system and the normative expectation as to the extent of state involvement in health careis adopted. Based on analysis of data collected from a telephone survey of adult Hong Kong citizens between late 2014 and early 2015, the findings of this study demonstrate a fairly high level of satisfaction with the territory's health system, but popular support for government responsibility presents a clear residual characteristic. The study also tests the self-interest thesis and the ideology thesismajor theoretical frameworks for explaining social policy legitimacyin the Hong Kong context. Egalitarian ideology and trust in government are closely related to both public satisfaction with the system and popular support for governmental provision of care. However, the self-interest thesis receives partial support. The findings are interpreted in the context of Hong Kong's health system arrangements, while implications for the territory's ongoing health policy reform are discussed.

Popular support for the social security system in urban China: evidence from a cross-sectional survey in a Chinese city

“…Reinforcing the findings of many previous studies based on other societies (He, 2018;Rothstein & Steinmo, 2002;Yang & Barrett, 2006), ideological recognition of the redistribution principle and general trust of the state were found to be very powerful predictors of most motivational items. These 'soft' elements of popular support seem to have transcended national boundaries and have become universal sources for the legitimacy of modern social security institutions.…”

“…Several empirical studies in both the East and the West have supported this ideology thesis by demonstrating that welfare attitudes are linked to more general ideological dispositions. For instance, endorsement of the concept of social rights and egalitarianism appears to be a key predictor of welfare support (Blekesaune & Quadagno, 2003;Edlund, 1999;Gelissen, 2000;He, 2018).…”

“…Greater satisfaction may further increase contributors' willingness-to-pay, fostering a healthy cycle, whereas dissatisfaction tends to erode their motivational basis. Moreover, general trust of the state has been recognised to be a crucial source of welfare legitimacy (He, 2018;Rothstein & Steinmo, 2002). This is particularly so for contributory programmes, given the requirement of long-term regular payment.…”

Responsibilization and Sexual Stigma Under Austerity: Surveying Public Support for Government-Funded PrEP in England

“…Public Opinion, Responsibilization, and "Risky" Sexual Behavior Public opinion on social programs is not only integral to the success of the policies behind them, but also shapes citizens' perceptions of government responsiveness and accountability; public opinion is thereby fundamental for the legitimacy of the welfare state itself (Bendz, 2017;Burstein, 1998;He, 2018;Judge & Solomon, 1993;Soss, 1999). But the actual impact of public opinion on policymaking is unclear.…”

The Effects of Healthcare Quality on the Willingness to Pay More Taxes to Improve Public Healthcare: Testing Two Alternative Hypotheses from the Research Literature

“…Alternatively, does a low quality of public healthcare services strengthen such a willingness? Answers to the posited questions are important given the current debate regarding how much people are willing to contribute to improving the quality of public healthcare [12345]. The debate is often underlined by a disjuncture between the relatively low tolerance to increased taxation for funding public healthcare, and high expectations regarding the quality of public healthcare.…”