2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3629405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Service Motivation And Sectoral Employment In Russia: New Perspectives On The Attraction Vs. Socialization Debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13-14). Further, the findings of studies by Gans-Morse et al (2020) and Olsen et al (2019) demonstrate a strong negative correlation between PSM and unethical behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…13-14). Further, the findings of studies by Gans-Morse et al (2020) and Olsen et al (2019) demonstrate a strong negative correlation between PSM and unethical behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There is a strong negative correlation between public service motivation and untheatrical behavior [Gans-Morse et al, 2020]. There is no direct, meaningful relationship between prosocial motivation and the dependent variable organizational citizenship behavior.…”
Section: Managerial Variables In Their Relationship With Organization...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Houston (2014) argued that the entire concept of prosocially motivated public sector employees rests on the assumption of a Weberian public administration system, whose primary attributes are merit, professionalism and impartiality, a clear politicsadministration dichotomy, and a strong public service ethos (Goran, 2009;Houston, 2014). This is echoed by Gans-Morse et al (2020) in their study of PSM in Russia and the argument they put forth that in post-communist states public service ethos may be less pronounced, and the notion of public interest may be interpreted by public officials differently from their counterparts elsewhere in the world. Nezhina and Barabashev (2017) describe the Russian public service as "non-participatory" and thus, poorly aligned with PSM.…”
Section: Autonomy and Intrinsic Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies that do address this important facet of public sector employment, public service motivation (PSM) (Perry & Wise, 1990) is the framework of choice. The major finding that unites these studies is their agreement on the impact of the deeply-entrenched Soviet-style administrative ethos on the motivations of public officials, the non-participatory character of the civil service, and the notion of public interest, which is differently interpreted by public officials in post-communist countries as compared to their counterparts elsewhere in the world (Gans-Morse et al, 2020;Houston, 2014;Nezhina & Barabashev, 2017). The research on intrinsic motivation and autonomy in the post-communist public sector context is non-existent in English language publication outlets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%