2015
DOI: 10.1177/0956247815595918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public toilets and their customers in low-income Accra, Ghana

Abstract: Public pay-per-use toilets are the only alternative to open defecation for a significant number of people in many low-income, urban neighbourhoods where insecure tenure, space constraints, and/or cost make private sanitation facilities unfeasible. This study explores public toilet use, characteristics of public toilet customers and possible improvements to public toilet facilities in four neighbourhoods in Accra, Ghana, the country with the highest reliance on shared sanitation facilities globally. Reliance on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most The majority of users were satisfied happy with some aspects of the services: such as location of the toilet facilities, number of cubicles in the facilities, internal space, lighting system, and the opening times. However, in line with another recent study in Accra (Peprah et al, 2015), our data indicate there were high rates of dissatisfaction with many of the most critical aspects of toilets facilities: such as convenience, security, privacy, cleanliness/hygiene, flow of water, availability of soap and water for hand-washing, and waiting time to use the facility. No (Interestingly, there were no statistically significant differences were identified in satisfaction levels of any criteria according to by gender, , age, etc.age or settlement location although, as noted above, the age range of respondents was relatively limited.…”
Section: Users' Satisfaction With Public Toilet Facilitiessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most The majority of users were satisfied happy with some aspects of the services: such as location of the toilet facilities, number of cubicles in the facilities, internal space, lighting system, and the opening times. However, in line with another recent study in Accra (Peprah et al, 2015), our data indicate there were high rates of dissatisfaction with many of the most critical aspects of toilets facilities: such as convenience, security, privacy, cleanliness/hygiene, flow of water, availability of soap and water for hand-washing, and waiting time to use the facility. No (Interestingly, there were no statistically significant differences were identified in satisfaction levels of any criteria according to by gender, , age, etc.age or settlement location although, as noted above, the age range of respondents was relatively limited.…”
Section: Users' Satisfaction With Public Toilet Facilitiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Under18s were excluded from the sample because they were not covered by the study's ethical approval, while older people generally declined to participate in the study, citing lack of time. Peprah et al (2015) note that public toilets in Accra are under-used by children and older people, who may either lack the money to use them or who may struggle to keep their balance over squat holes designed for adults (see also Van der Geest and Obirih-Opareh, 2002). and most were single.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By this focus, the study contributes to urban research in Tamale relative to previous studies that have had narrow focus on single themes such as housing (Boamah, 2010;Yakubu et al, 2014), agriculture and food security (Fuseini, 2014;Naab, Dinye, & Kasanga, 2013), urban growth dynamics (Braimoh & Vlek, 2004) or multiple themes of different focus . The study so provides an understanding of urban growth and urban governance issues as well as access to vital urban services by adding to the body of urban research in Ghana (see for example Obeng-Odoom, 2013a,b, 2015a2010b;Adarkwa, 2012;Akaateba & Yakubu, 2013;Ayee & Crook, 2003;Boamah, 2012Boamah, , 2013aBoamah et al, 2012;Cobbinah & Amoako, 2012;Cobbinah & Korah, 2015;Peprah et al, 2015;Ubink, 2008;Yeboah & Obeng-Odoom, 2010;Owusu, 2011;Yeboah & Shaw, 2013;Yeboah, 2003;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%