Publisher’s Note: Measurement of 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>sin</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>lept</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math>
 using 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml

Aaltonen, T.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.119901

Cited by 11 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…total unc. reference DØ 0.23095 0.00035 0.00007 0.00019 0.00008 0.00047 [223] CDF 0.23221 0.00043 0.00003 0.00016 0.00006 0.00046 [224] Tevatron (combined) 0.23148 0.00027 0.00005 0.00018 0.00006 0.00033 [225] CMS 0.23101 0.00036 0.00018 0.00030 0.00016 0.00053 [226] ATLAS (central) 0.23119 0.00031 0.00018 0.00033 0.00006 0.00049 [227] ATLAS (forward) 0.23166 0.00029 0.00021 0.00022 0.00010 0.00043 [227] ATLAS (combined) 0.23140 0.00021 0.00014 0.00024 0.00007 0.00036 [227] LHCb 0.23142 0.00073 0.00052 0.00043 * 0.00036 * 0.00106 [228] A had F B (LEP) 0.23240 0.00070 0.00100 --0.00120 [19] A l (LEP) 0.23099 0.00042 * 0.00032 * --0.00053 [19] Aτ + Ae (LEP) 0.23159 0.00037 * 0.00018 * --0.00041 [19] A b FB (LEP) 0.23221 0.00023 * 0.00017 * --0.00029 [19] A l (SLD) 0.23098 0.00024 0.00013 --0.00026 [19] Table 3.9: Overview of selected measurements at LEP, SLD, Tevatron and the LHC of the effective leptonic electroweak mixing angle sin 2 θ l eff using different observables including a breakdown of different sources of uncertainties. Values which are indicated with an asterisk have not been published and hence only estimated within this work.…”

Section: Asymmetry Measurements At Lep and Slcmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a refinement, another form factor, κ eq , multiplying terms proportional to sin 4 θ W can be introduced. This approach leads to an enhanced Born approximation, which was used for the first time by the CDF collaboration [224]. This correction leads to a shift of +0.00022 ± 0.00004 in the extracted value of sin 2 θ l eff .…”

Section: Principle and Challenges Of Sin 2 θ Lmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Electroweak precision tests of the Standard Model after the discovery of the Higgs boson

Erler

Schott

2019

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global fit of the Standard Model predictions to electroweak precision data, which has been routinely performed in the past decades by several groups, led to the prediction of the top quark and the Higgs boson masses before their respective discoveries. With the measurement of the Higgs boson mass at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in 2012 by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations, the last free parameter of the Standard Model of particle physics has been fixed, and the global electroweak fit can be used to test the full internal consistency of the electroweak sector of the Standard Model and constrain models beyond. In this article, we review the current state-of-the-art theoretical calculations, as well as the precision measurements performed at the LHC, and interpret them within the context of the global electroweak fit. Special focus is drawn in the impact of the Higgs boson mass on the fit.

show abstract

Section: Asymmetry Measurements At Lep and Slcmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Principle and Challenges Of Sin 2 θ Lmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electroweak precision tests of the Standard Model after the discovery of the Higgs boson

Erler

Schott

2019

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CDF measurements for the electron [9] and muon [8] channels use the full Tevatron Run II data set, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb −1 of pp collisions. Similar methods are used for both analyses.…”

Section: A Cdf Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Details of the electron-and muon-selection criteria are presented in Refs. [9] and [8], respectively. Kinematic, fiducial, and lepton-identification criteria are applied.…”

Section: A Cdf Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Drell-Yan process and the production of quark pairs in high-energy e + e − collisions are analogous processes: qq → ℓ + ℓ − and e + e − → qq. The sin 2 θ lept eff parameter of processes involving leptons has been investigated at the LEP-1 and SLC [4,5] e + e − colliders operating on or in the vicinity of the Z-boson pole mass, and at the Tevatron [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and LHC [14][15][16] hadron colliders. Investigations at hadron colliders use Drell-Yan pairs whose range of invariant masses about the Z-boson resonant peak is broad relative to the e + e − collider investigations.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tevatron Run II combination of the effective leptonic electroweak mixing angle

Aaltonen¹,

Abazov²,

Abbott³

et al. 2018

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Precise predictions for the angular coefficients in Z-boson production at the LHC

Gauld

Ridder

Gehrmann

et al. 2017

J. High Energ. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The angular distributions of lepton pairs in the Drell-Yan process can provide rich information on the underlying QCD production mechanisms. These dynamics can be parameterised in terms of a set of frame dependent angular coefficients, A i=0,...,7 , which depend on the invariant mass, transverse momentum, and rapidity of the lepton pair. Motivated by recent measurements of these coefficients by ATLAS and CMS, and in particular by the apparent violation of the Lam-Tung relation A 0 − A 2 = 0, we perform a precision study of the angular coefficients at O(α 3 s ) in perturbative QCD. We make predictions relevant for pp collisions at √ s = 8 TeV, and perform comparisons with the available ATLAS and CMS data as well as providing predictions for a prospective measurement at LHCb. To expose the violation of the Lam-Tung relationship we propose a new observable ∆ LT = 1 − A 2 /A 0 that is more sensitive to the dynamics in the region where A 0 and A 2 are both small. We find that the O(α 3 s ) corrections have an important impact on the p T,Z distributions for several of the angular coefficients, and are essential to provide an adequate description of the data. The compatibility of the available ATLAS and CMS data is reassessed by performing a partial χ 2 test with respect to the central theoretical prediction which shows that χ 2 /N data is significantly reduced by going from O(α 2 s ) to O(α 3 s ).

show abstract

Publisher’s Note: Measurement of sin2θefflept using e+e

Abstract: Measurement of sin

Cited by 11 publications

References 46 publications

Electroweak precision tests of the Standard Model after the discovery of the Higgs boson

Electroweak precision tests of the Standard Model after the discovery of the Higgs boson

Tevatron Run II combination of the effective leptonic electroweak mixing angle

Precise predictions for the angular coefficients in Z-boson production at the LHC

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About