2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pullback attractors of nonautonomous reaction–diffusion equations

Abstract: In this paper, firstly we introduce the concept of norm-to-weak continuous cocycle in Banach space and give a technical method to verify this kind of continuity, then we obtain some abstract results for the existence of pullback attractors about this kind of cocycle, using the measure of noncompactness. As an application, we prove the existence of pullback attractors in H 1 0 of the cocycle associated with the solutions for some nonlinear nonautonomous reaction-diffusion equations. The attractor pullback attra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a bounded domain Ω, and a translation bounded function h ∈ L 2 loc (R; L 2 (Ω)), the existence of a uniform attractor in L p (Ω) is demonstrated in [Song & Zhong, 2008]. Finally, the reader can find similar results for several variants of our model in the references [Wang et al, 2007], [Prizzi, 2003], [Morillas & Valero, 2005], [Sun & Zhong, 2005], among others.…”
Section: Introduction and Setting Of The Problemsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a bounded domain Ω, and a translation bounded function h ∈ L 2 loc (R; L 2 (Ω)), the existence of a uniform attractor in L p (Ω) is demonstrated in [Song & Zhong, 2008]. Finally, the reader can find similar results for several variants of our model in the references [Wang et al, 2007], [Prizzi, 2003], [Morillas & Valero, 2005], [Sun & Zhong, 2005], among others.…”
Section: Introduction and Setting Of The Problemsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This, and the fact that the non-autonomous h belongs to the space L 2 loc (R; H −1 (Ω)), are the main novelties of our problem. The lack of compactness of the injection H 1 0 (Ω) ⊂ L 2 (Ω) (in the case of unbounded domains) implies that the standard techniques previously used, particularly the one involving the so-called flatenning property (see [Kloeden & Langa, 2007], [Li & Zhong, 2007], [Song & Wu, 2007], [Wang & Zhong, 2008], amongst others), which have been successfully used when Ω is bounded and h ∈ L 2 loc (R; L 2 (Ω)), do not work in our case.…”
Section: Introduction and Setting Of The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First we recall the definition of a cocycle and a pullback attractor, then, following [10], recall the abstract theory, and in the end apply the latter to our problem. Definition 4.1.…”
Section: W(t) U(t)) + B(u(t) ξ(T) U(t))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the autonomous case, i.e., ( ) g t does not depend on the time, the asymptotic behaviors of the solution have been studied extensively in the framework of global attractor, see [4]- [6]. For the nonautonomous case, the asymptotic behaviors of the solution have been studied in the framework of pullback attractor, see [7]- [9]. Recently, the theory of pullback exponential attractor have been developed, see [1]- [3], and some methods are given to prove the existence of pullback exponential attractors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%