, and virus isolation. Eighty-two samples were tested, and 44 were positive, 34 by both NASBA and RT-PCR and 5 each by NASBA or RT-PCR only. Two nasopharyngeal samples positive only by RT-PCR were determined to be rhinovirus. Of 42 enterovirus-positive samples, NASBA detected 39 (92.9%) and RT-PCR detected 37 (88.1%). The NucliSens Basic kit and the Argene Biosoft RT-PCR had comparable sensitivities for detection of enterovirus RNA, and both molecular methods were more sensitive than culture, which detected only 60.5% of positive samples. NASBA could be completed in 6.5 h versus 9 h for the Argene Biosoft RT-PCR kit.Enterovirus (EV) infections are extremely common, with an estimated 10 to 30 million infections occurring annually in the United States alone (15). While most infections either are asymptomatic or result in minor illnesses, aseptic meningitis and neonatal sepsis syndrome bring many patients to the hospital (16-18).For the past 50 years, the mainstay of EV diagnosis has been virus isolation in cell culture (5). The optimal cell culture systems for the isolation of more than 60 recognized EV serotypes differ. To increase recovery, ideally five different cell systems should be employed (2, 5, 7). Use of E-mix cells has been reported to reduce the number of tubes inoculated and to increase recovery (1). However, the turnaround time for cell culture is usually 2 to 7 days for positive results and 10 to 14 days for negative reports. Lastly, many coxsackie group A serotypes require suckling mouse inoculation (5).Nucleic acid amplification techniques can detect most serotypes, including those that grow poorly or not at all in cell culture, can provide results within 24 h, and, consequently, can significantly alter patient management (13,14,20). Molecular methods also require a smaller volume of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than comprehensive culture, an important advantage. To inoculate five cell culture systems, 1 ml of CSF is needed, but this amount is often not available. In contrast, only 0.2 ml is needed for nucleic acid extraction. In addition, other pathogens that cause viral meningitis, such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 2, can also be detected by using the same nucleic acid extract.In the 1990s, several studies were published validating the AMPLICOR reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) enterovirus kit from Roche (12,15,19,22). Subsequently, however, the AMPLICOR kit was withdrawn from the market. More recently, studies using real-time PCR for EV diagnosis have been reported (10, 21). However, many smaller laboratories may not have access to expensive real-time PCR equipment and may lack the expertise needed to develop molecular techniques in-house. Instead, they rely on commercial kits to bring molecular technology to the patients they serve.We and others have recently reported on nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) using the NucliSens Basic kit for the diagnosis of EVs (3, 9; F. Zhang, C. C. Ginocchio, A. Malhotra, and C. Chakrabarti, presented at the 18th Annual Clinical Virology Sym...